Usage Score
12.3
Player Dossier
2022-2025North Texas
LB • 6'1" • 234 lbs • Mckinney, TX, USA
Ethan Wesloski shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.1 disruption score.
Usage Score
12.3
Efficiency
44.1
Consistency
54.5
Season Value
52.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ethan Wesloski, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · North Texas. Ethan Wesloski shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.1 disruption score.
Ethan Wesloski played LB for North Texas. Across 4 tracked seasons, Ethan Wesloski recorded 229 tackles and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with North Texas.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
North Texas paired 17.5 primary output with 44.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 44.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
44.1
Usage
12.3
Consistency
54.5
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 1. Lamar: 2.5. Western Michigan: 2. Washington State: 0. Army: 4. South Alabama: 2. South Florida: 0. UTSA: 1. Charlotte: 1.5. Navy: 1. UAB: 1. Rice: 1.5. Temple: 0. Tulane: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 9 by 47.5. Lamar: 7 by 54.2. Western Michigan: 8 by 53.3. Washington State: 1 by 4.2. Army: 11 by 85.8. South Alabama: 4 by 36.7. South Florida: 5 by 20.8. UTSA: 5 by 30.8. Charlotte: 10 by 56.7. Navy: 14 by 60. UAB: 6 by 35. Rice: 17 by 65. Temple: 9 by 37.5. Tulane: 7 by 29.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
85.8 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | @ San Diego State | W 49-47 | 9 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/6 | @ Tulane | L 21-34 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Temple | W 52-25 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Rice10+ tackles | W 56-24 | 17 | 10 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ UAB | W 53-24 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Navy10+ tackles | W 31-17 | 14 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/24 | @ Charlotte10+ tackles | W 54-20 | 10 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs UTSA | W 55-17 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/10 | vs South Florida | L 36-63 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs South AlabamaSplash game | W 36-22 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Army10+ tackles · Splash game | W 45-38 | 11 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Washington State | W 59-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Western MichiganSplash game | W 33-30 | 8 | 6 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/31 | vs LamarSplash game | W 51-0 | 7 | 2 | — | 2 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | North Texas | 10.5 | 31.9 | 8.3 | 10.5 |
| 2024 Postseason | North Texas | 10.5 | 26.4 | 6.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | North Texas | 10.5 | 26.4 | 6.8 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | North Texas | 17.5 | 44.1 | 12.3 | 7 |
| 2025 Regular Season | North Texas | 17.5 | 44.1 | 12.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Army
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 71.3 takeover score.
#2
Memphis
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 63.6 takeover score.
#3
California
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.7 takeover score.
#4
Tulsa
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.1 takeover score.
#5
Tulsa
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · North Texas
17.5 primary output · 44.1 efficiency · 12.3 usage
52.7
#2
2025 Regular Season · North Texas
52.7
17.5 primary · 44.1 efficiency · 12.3 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · North Texas
37.3
10.5 primary · 26.4 efficiency · 6.8 usage
2
Impact games
9
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.7933
McKinney Boyd · McKinney, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
229
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.