Usage Score
27.5
Player Profile
Iverson Hooks
WR • 5'10" • 175 lbs • Pike Road, AL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Iverson Hooks reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.6
Consistency
66
Season Value
67.6
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UAB
22232425
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Primary stop by seasons
- UAB
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UAB
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Iverson Hooks, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UAB. Iverson Hooks reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
UAB paired 927 primary output with 79.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 79.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · UAB
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
77.3
Efficiency
79.6
Usage
27.5
Consistency
66
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 73. Navy: 72. Akron: 84. Tennessee: 38. Army: 71. Florida Atlantic: 50. Memphis: 172. UConn: 28. Rice: 89. North Texas: 58. South Florida: 146. Tulsa: 46
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 7 by 69.5. Navy: 4 by 100. Akron: 5 by 100. Tennessee: 5 by 50.7. Army: 4 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 66.7. Memphis: 11 by 100. UConn: 4 by 46.7. Rice: 6 by 98.9. North Texas: 6 by 64.4. South Florida: 10 by 97.3. Tulsa: 5 by 61.3
Split Comparison
Wins100.7 · n=3 · +31.7 vs Losses
Losses69 · n=8 · -31.7 vs Wins
First Half64.7 · n=6 · -25.2 vs Second Half
Second Half89.8 · n=6 · +25.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Tulsa | W 31-24 | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs South Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | L 18-48 | — | 10 | 146 | 13.3 | 14.60 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs North Texas | L 24-53 | — | 6 | 58 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 17-24 | — | 6 | 89 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ UConn | L 19-38 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-24 | — | 11 | 172 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 3 | 31 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 33-53 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Army | L 13-31 | — | 4 | 71 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Tennessee | L 24-56 | — | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Akron | W 31-28 | — | 5 | 84 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Navy | L 24-38 | — | 4 | 72 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 51 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 73 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 1 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2022202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | UAB | 13 | 86.7 | 5.6 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | UAB | 106 | 66.7 | 9.9 | 93 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UAB | 179 | 83.8 | 13.3 | 73 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UAB | 927 | 79.6 | 27.5 | 748 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
172
Primary metric
172 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Florida
146
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 97.3 efficiency score.
#3
Navy
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia Southern
80
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
13
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · UAB
927 primary output · 79.6 efficiency · 27.5 usage
67.6
#2
2022 Regular Season · UAB
48.4
13 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 5.6 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · UAB
46.1
179 primary · 83.8 efficiency · 13.3 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8267
Pike Road · Pike Road, AL
- Committed To
- UAB
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,225
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 21 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.