Player Stats

Cyrus Allen College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,216
Receptions
137
Touchdowns
22

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech923509465.3
2023 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech1146778478
2024 Regular SeasonTexas A&M818269152.2
2025 PostseasonCincinnati1329171
2025 Regular SeasonCincinnati13486511271

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Louisiana Tech paired 778 primary output with 90.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 70 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Louisiana Tech, Texas A&M, Cincinnati.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Cincinnati

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

50.8

Efficiency

70

Usage

21.8

Consistency

56.5

Best Game by takeover score

Kansas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Navy: 9. Nebraska: 41. Bowling Green: 45. Northwestern State: 59. Kansas: 128. Iowa State: 22. UCF: -1. Oklahoma State: 37. Baylor: 36. Utah: 133. Arizona: 58. BYU: 51. TCU: 42

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 2 by 30. Nebraska: 5 by 54.7. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. Northwestern State: 4 by 98.3. Kansas: 11 by 77.6. Iowa State: 3 by 48.9. UCF: 1 by 0. Oklahoma State: 3 by 82.2. Baylor: 3 by 80. Utah: 2 by 100. Arizona: 5 by 77.3. BYU: 5 by 68. TCU: 3 by 93.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins46.6 · Games = 7 · -9.1 vs Losses
Losses55.7 · Games = 6 · +9.1 vs Wins