Player Stats

Red Murdock College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
359
TFL
38
Sacks
9
QB hurries
7
Passes defended
3
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonBuffalo26-0-1023.4
2023 Regular SeasonBuffalo1055822-053.5
2024 PostseasonBuffalo13132.50-1277.8
2024 Regular SeasonBuffalo131431424-077.8
2025 Regular SeasonBuffalo1214213.5511076.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Buffalo paired 24.5 primary output with 63.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 61.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Akron

Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Buffalo

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.7

Efficiency

61.2

Usage

15.3

Consistency

62.1

Best Game by takeover score

Akron

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 2. St. Francis (PA): 1.5. Kent State: 0. Troy: 3.5. UConn: 1. Eastern Michigan: 2. Massachusetts: 2.5. Akron: 4. Bowling Green: 2.5. Central Michigan: 0. Miami (OH): 0.5. Ohio: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 16 by 70. St. Francis (PA): 6 by 40. Kent State: 10 by 41.7. Troy: 12 by 85. UConn: 9 by 47.5. Eastern Michigan: 17 by 70. Massachusetts: 9 by 62.5. Akron: 13 by 90. Bowling Green: 13 by 75. Central Michigan: 9 by 37.5. Miami (OH): 14 by 55. Ohio: 14 by 60

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.7 · Games = 5 · -0.0 vs Losses
Losses1.7 · Games = 7 · +0.0 vs Wins