Usage Score
7.1
Player Dossier
2022-2025Bowling Green
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Frankfort, IL, USA
Trey Johnson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
7.1
Efficiency
53.3
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
36.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trey Johnson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Trey Johnson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Trey Johnson played WR for Bowling Green. Across 4 tracked seasons, Trey Johnson recorded 15 receiving yards and 4 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Bowling Green.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 53.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
2.7
Efficiency
53.3
Usage
7.1
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 0. Kent State: 8. Akron: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
53.3 vs Kent State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 7 | 46.7 | 5.6 | 7 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 8 | 53.3 | 7.1 | 1 |
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8
Primary metric
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
7
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#3
Toledo
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
Central Michigan
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Texas A&M
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Bowling Green
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2025 Regular Season · Bowling Green
36.1
8 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 7.1 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Bowling Green
31.8
7 primary · 46.7 efficiency · 5.6 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8426
Central Catholic · Toledo, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
15
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 7 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.