Player Stats

Justin Holmes College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
500
Receptions
49
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonKent State1-00100
2023 Regular SeasonKent State1020188049
2024 Regular SeasonMarshall3111026.2
2025 PostseasonPittsburgh116100060.1
2025 Regular SeasonPittsburgh1122201460.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Kent State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 62.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kent State, Marshall, Pittsburgh.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Pittsburgh

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

27.4

Efficiency

62.7

Usage

11

Consistency

41.1

Best Game by takeover score

East Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. East Carolina: 100. Central Michigan: 25. West Virginia: 14. Louisville: 17. Boston College: 40. Florida State: 0. NC State: 22. Stanford: 34. Notre Dame: 16. Georgia Tech: 19. Miami: 14

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Carolina: 6 by 100. Central Michigan: 2 by 83.3. West Virginia: 2 by 46.7. Louisville: 2 by 56.7. Boston College: 3 by 88.9. Florida State: 1 by 0. NC State: 2 by 73.3. Stanford: 4 by 56.7. Notre Dame: 2 by 53.3. Georgia Tech: 1 by 100. Miami: 3 by 31.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins23.3 · Games = 6 · -8.9 vs Losses
Losses32.2 · Games = 5 · +8.9 vs Wins