Usage Score
10.4
Player Dossier
2022-2025Texas Tech
Harvey Dyson
LB • 6'3" • 250 lbs • Cedar Hill, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Harvey Dyson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
25.8
Consistency
62.1
Season Value
39.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tulane
222323242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas Tech • Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Harvey Dyson, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tulane. Harvey Dyson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Tulane paired 18 primary output with 25.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 25.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas Tech, Tulane.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Tulane
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
25.8
Usage
10.4
Consistency
62.1
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 2. South Alabama: 1. Duke: 0.5. Ole Miss: 1.5. Tulsa: 4. East Carolina: 2. Army: 1. Memphis: 2. Florida Atlantic: 1.5. Temple: 0. Charlotte: 0. North Texas: 2.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 1 by 24.2. South Alabama: 4 by 26.7. Duke: 1 by 9.2. Ole Miss: 3 by 27.5. Tulsa: 2 by 48.3. East Carolina: 4 by 36.7. Army: 3 by 22.5. Memphis: 2 by 28.3. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 35.8. Temple: 2 by 8.3. Charlotte: 1 by 4.2. North Texas: 3 by 37.5
Split Comparison
Wins1.4 · n=10 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses1.8 · n=2 · +0.3 vs Wins
First Half1.8 · n=6 · +0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half1.2 · n=6 · -0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
48.3 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | @ Ole Miss | L 10-41 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/6 | vs North Texas | W 34-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/30 | vs Charlotte | W 27-0 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Temple | W 37-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 35-24 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Memphis | W 38-32 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Army | W 24-17 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/9 | vs East Carolina | W 26-19 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Tulsa2+ sacks · Splash game | W 31-14 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Ole Miss | L 10-45 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Duke | W 34-27 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ South Alabama | W 33-31 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas Tech
2022-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Tulane
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202220232023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Texas Tech | 1 | 6.2 | 1.3 | 1 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 1 | 6.2 | 1.3 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 6 | 14.5 | 5.1 | 5 |
| 2025 Postseason | Tulane | 18 | 25.8 | 10.4 | 12 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Tulane | 18 | 25.8 | 10.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 53.5 takeover score.
#2
TCU
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 48.4 takeover score.
#3
California
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 39.2 takeover score.
#4
North Texas
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 37.6 takeover score.
#5
Colorado
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 33.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Tulane
18 primary output · 25.8 efficiency · 10.4 usage
39.1
#2
2025 Regular Season · Tulane
39.1
18 primary · 25.8 efficiency · 10.4 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Texas Tech
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8507
Cedar Hill · Cedar Hill, TX
- Committed To
- Texas Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
47
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 25 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.