Usage Score
5.5
Player Dossier
2023-2025Oregon
DL • 6'3" • 330 lbs • Detroit, MI, USA
A'Mauri Washington shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.5
Efficiency
21.2
Consistency
61.3
Season Value
47
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Oregon
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A'Mauri Washington, DL. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Oregon. A'Mauri Washington shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.2 disruption score.
A'Mauri Washington played DL for Oregon. Across 3 tracked seasons, A'Mauri Washington recorded 44 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Oregon.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Oregon paired 18 primary output with 21.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
15
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
21.2
Usage
5.5
Consistency
61.3
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 0. Texas Tech: 1. James Madison: 1.5. Montana State: 1.5. Oklahoma State: 1. Northwestern: 0. Oregon State: 0. Penn State: 0.5. Indiana: 3. Rutgers: 2. Wisconsin: 2. Iowa: 1. Minnesota: 1. USC: 2.5. Washington: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 2 by 8.3. Texas Tech: 0 by 10. James Madison: 2 by 23.3. Montana State: 5 by 35.8. Oklahoma State: 1 by 14.2. Northwestern: 1 by 4.2. Oregon State: 1 by 4.2. Penn State: 5 by 25.8. Indiana: 3 by 42.5. Rutgers: 0 by 20. Wisconsin: 4 by 36.7. Iowa: 3 by 22.5. Minnesota: 0 by 10. USC: 4 by 41.7. Washington: 2 by 18.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
42.5 vs Indiana
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/10 | @ Indiana | L 22-56 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 1/1 | @ Texas Tech | W 23-0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 12/21 | vs James Madison | W 51-34 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Washington | W 26-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs USCSplash game | W 42-27 | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Minnesota | W 42-13 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Iowa | W 18-16 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs WisconsinSplash game | W 21-7 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ RutgersSplash game | W 56-10 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs IndianaSplash game | L 20-30 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Penn State | W 30-24 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Oregon State | W 41-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Northwestern | W 34-14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Oklahoma State | W 69-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Montana State | W 59-13 | 5 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oregon
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Oregon | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oregon | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oregon | 7.5 | 12.5 | 3.7 | 7.5 |
| 2025 Postseason | Oregon | 18 | 21.2 | 5.5 | 10.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oregon | 18 | 21.2 | 5.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.6 takeover score.
#2
USC
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 44.7 takeover score.
#3
Maryland
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 41.5 takeover score.
#4
Wisconsin
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 37.6 takeover score.
#5
Montana State
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 32.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Oregon
18 primary output · 21.2 efficiency · 5.5 usage
47
#2
2025 Regular Season · Oregon
47
18 primary · 21.2 efficiency · 5.5 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Oregon
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
0
Impact games
5
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9133
Chandler · Chandler, AZ
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
44
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.