Usage Score
37.3
Player Dossier
2023-2025California
RB • 5'11" • 200 lbs • Naples, FL, USA
Kendrick Raphael leans workhorse runner traits and 43.5 efficiency.
Usage Score
37.3
Efficiency
43.5
Consistency
75.5
Season Value
64.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · California
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kendrick Raphael, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · California. Kendrick Raphael leans workhorse runner traits and 43.5 efficiency.
Kendrick Raphael played RB for NC State and California. Across 3 tracked seasons, Kendrick Raphael recorded 1,688 rushing yards, 382 receiving yards, and 18 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with California.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
California paired 1,197 primary output with 43.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 43.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across NC State, California.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
92.1
Efficiency
43.5
Usage
37.3
Consistency
75.5
Best Game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 104. Oregon State: 32. Unknown: 134. Minnesota: 48. San Diego State: 27. Boston College: 122. Duke: 92. North Carolina: 96. Virginia Tech: 87. Virginia: 112. Louisville: 120. Stanford: 59. SMU: 164
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Hawai'i: 20 by 54.8. Oregon State: 10 by 39. Unknown: 20 by 73.4. Minnesota: 14 by 34.5. San Diego State: 11 by 25.6. Boston College: 26 by 49.3. Duke: 21 by 41.5. North Carolina: 24 by 39.7. Virginia Tech: 23 by 37.9. Virginia: 17 by 49.6. Louisville: 24 by 48.1. Stanford: 19 by 32.5. SMU: 38 by 39
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
73.4 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/25 | @ Hawai'i | L 31-35 | 17 | 90 | 5.30 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 5.2 |
| Sun 11/30 | vs SMU100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 38-35 | 33 | 111 | 3.40 | 1 | 5 | 53 | 4.3 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Stanford | L 10-31 | 15 | 47 | 3.10 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 3.1 |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Louisville | W 29-26 | 19 | 83 | 4.40 | 1 | 5 | 37 | 5 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Virginia2+ TD | L 21-31 | 13 | 46 | 3.50 | 2 | 4 | 66 | 6.6 |
| Fri 10/24 | @ Virginia Tech2+ TD | L 34-42 | 20 | 71 | 3.60 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 3.8 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs North Carolina | W 21-18 | 22 | 81 | 3.70 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 4 |
| Sun 10/5 | vs Duke2+ TD | L 21-45 | 18 | 67 | 3.70 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 4.4 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Boston College100 rush yards | W 28-24 | 25 | 119 | 4.80 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4.7 |
| Sun 9/21 | @ San Diego State | L 0-34 | 11 | 27 | 2.50 | 0 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Minnesota | W 27-14 | 13 | 42 | 3.20 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3.4 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown100 rush yards | — | 18 | 131 | 7.30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6.7 |
| Sun 8/31 | @ Oregon State | W 34-15 | 9 | 37 | 4.10 | 0 | 1 | -5 | 3.2 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
NC State
2023-2024
Opening stop
California
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | NC State | 407 | 51.6 | 13.5 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | NC State | 407 | 51.6 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | NC State | 466 | 48.6 | 14.4 | 59 |
| 2024 Regular Season | NC State | 466 | 48.6 | 14.4 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | California | 1,197 | 43.5 | 37.3 | 731 |
| 2025 Regular Season | California | 1,197 | 43.5 | 37.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Clemson
Loss with 90 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
90
Primary metric
90 scrimmage yards and 17.2 usage.
#2
SMU
164
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
164 scrimmage yards and 55.9 usage.
#3
Georgia Tech
78
Primary metric
Loss with 78 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
78 scrimmage yards and 19.6 usage.
#4
Unknown
134
Primary metric
Game with 134 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
134 scrimmage yards and 32.3 usage.
#5
Unknown
85
Primary metric
Game with 85 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
85 scrimmage yards and 22.2 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · California
1,197 primary output · 43.5 efficiency · 37.3 usage
64.1
#2
2025 Regular Season · California
64.1
1,197 primary · 43.5 efficiency · 37.3 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · NC State
42.5
407 primary · 51.6 efficiency · 13.5 usage
6
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8875
Naples · Naples, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,070
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.