Usage Score
14.8
Player Dossier
2023-2025Michigan
Semaj Morgan
WR • 5'10" • 174 lbs • West Bloomfield, MI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Semaj Morgan reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.1
Consistency
49.4
Season Value
56
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Michigan
232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Semaj Morgan, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Michigan. Semaj Morgan reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Semaj Morgan played WR for Michigan. Across 3 tracked seasons, Semaj Morgan recorded 124 rushing yards, 566 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Michigan.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Michigan paired 223 primary output with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Michigan
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
20.3
Efficiency
70.1
Usage
14.8
Consistency
49.4
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 9. New Mexico: 33. Oklahoma: 19. Central Michigan: 69. Nebraska: 22. Wisconsin: 44. USC: 7. Washington: 20. Michigan State: 0. Purdue: 0. Northwestern: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 1 by 60. New Mexico: 4 by 55. Oklahoma: 1 by 100. Central Michigan: 4 by 100. Nebraska: 2 by 73.3. Wisconsin: 5 by 58.7. USC: 1 by 46.7. Washington: 2 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins23.5 · Games = 8 · +11.8 vs Losses
Losses11.7 · Games = 3 · -11.8 vs Wins
First Half32.7 · Games = 6 · +27.3 vs Second Half
Second Half5.4 · Games = 5 · -27.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Central Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | @ Texas | L 27-41 | — | 1 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Northwestern | W 24-22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Purdue | W 21-16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Michigan State | W 31-20 | — | — | — | 6 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Washington | W 24-7 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ USC | L 13-31 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Wisconsin | W 24-10 | — | 5 | 44 | 7.7 | 8.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Nebraska | W 30-27 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Central Michigan | W 63-3 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Oklahoma | L 13-24 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs New Mexico | W 34-17 | — | 4 | 33 | 7.8 | 8.30 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Michigan | 204 | 54.7 | 12.1 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Michigan | 204 | 54.7 | 12.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Michigan | 139 | 37.2 | 19.9 | -65 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Michigan | 139 | 37.2 | 19.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Michigan | 223 | 70.1 | 14.8 | 84 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Michigan | 223 | 70.1 | 14.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69
Primary metric
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Michigan State
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
UNLV
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas
45
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
Purdue
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Michigan
223 primary output · 70.1 efficiency · 14.8 usage
56
#2
2025 Regular Season · Michigan
56
223 primary · 70.1 efficiency · 14.8 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Michigan
50.8
204 primary · 54.7 efficiency · 12.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8867
West Bloomfield · West Bloomfield, MI
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
566
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.