Usage Score
10
Player Dossier
2023-2025Arkansas
Jaden Platt
TE • 6'5" • 260 lbs • Haslet, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jaden Platt reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.2
Consistency
59
Season Value
61
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Texas A&M
23232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Texas A&M • Arkansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaden Platt, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Jaden Platt reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jaden Platt played TE for Texas A&M and Arkansas. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jaden Platt recorded 348 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Arkansas.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, Arkansas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Arkansas
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
26.9
Efficiency
76.2
Usage
10
Consistency
59
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 15. Arkansas State: 31. Ole Miss: 53. Memphis: 44. Notre Dame: 23. Tennessee: 6. Texas A&M: 4. Mississippi State: 23. LSU: 26. Texas: 66. Missouri: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 100. Arkansas State: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 3 by 100. Memphis: 2 by 100. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. Tennessee: 1 by 40. Texas A&M: 1 by 26.7. Mississippi State: 3 by 51.1. LSU: 2 by 86.7. Texas: 4 by 100. Missouri: 1 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses27.8 · Games = 9
First Half28.7 · Games = 6 · +3.9 vs Second Half
Second Half24.8 · Games = 5 · -3.9 vs First Half
All Games26.9 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Missouri | L 17-31 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Texas | L 37-52 | — | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ LSU | L 22-23 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Mississippi State | L 35-38 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Texas A&M | L 42-45 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Tennessee | L 31-34 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Notre Dame | L 13-56 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Memphis | L 31-32 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Ole Miss | L 35-41 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Arkansas State | W 56-14 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2023-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Arkansas
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2023202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Texas A&M | 52 | 93.4 | 5.4 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 52 | 93.4 | 5.4 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | -52 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Arkansas | 296 | 76.2 | 10 | 296 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66
Primary metric
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma State
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ole Miss
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arkansas State
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Texas A&M
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2025 Regular Season · Arkansas
61
296 primary · 76.2 efficiency · 10 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Texas A&M
45.7
52 primary · 93.4 efficiency · 5.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9125
Eaton · Haslet, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
348
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 14 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.