Player Stats

Tyler Tettleton College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
10,031
Passing yards
9,129
Rushing yards
902
Touchdowns
83

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonOhio8104128-24120.7
2010 Regular SeasonOhio00000-
2011 PostseasonOhio1425122031379.7
2011 Regular SeasonOhio143,7133,0866273579.7
2012 PostseasonOhio1236533134268.1
2012 Regular SeasonOhio122,7232,5132102168.1
2013 PostseasonOhio1324222814157.3
2013 Regular SeasonOhio132,6332,623102057.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason

Ohio paired 3,964 primary output with 65.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 59.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan

Win with 385 yards of offense and 72.1 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · Ohio

Games

13

Primary Metric / G

221.2

Efficiency

59.4

Usage

10.5

Consistency

74

Best Game by takeover score

Eastern Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. East Carolina: 242. Louisville: 140. North Texas: 256. Marshall: 249. Austin Peay: 208. Akron: 175. Central Michigan: 312. Eastern Michigan: 385. Miami (OH): 314. Buffalo: 105. Bowling Green: 87. Kent State: 122. Massachusetts: 280

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Carolina: 44 by 51.3. Louisville: 23 by 66.2. North Texas: 33 by 64.9. Marshall: 42 by 56. Austin Peay: 16 by 71.7. Akron: 24 by 57.2. Central Michigan: 35 by 57.3. Eastern Michigan: 34 by 72.1. Miami (OH): 35 by 68.8. Buffalo: 37 by 44.8. Bowling Green: 32 by 42.4. Kent State: 27 by 43.8. Massachusetts: 32 by 75.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins266.7 · Games = 7 · +98.7 vs Losses
Losses168 · Games = 6 · -98.7 vs Wins