Usage Score
10.1
Player Dossier
2022-2025South Alabama
Miller McCrumby
TE • 6'3" • 234 lbs • Mount Pleasant, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Miller McCrumby reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
51.9
Consistency
59.9
Season Value
55.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Arkansas State
2223232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Arkansas State • South Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Miller McCrumby, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Arkansas State. Miller McCrumby reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Miller McCrumby played TE for Arkansas State and South Alabama. Across 4 tracked seasons, Miller McCrumby recorded 345 receiving yards and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with South Alabama.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 129 primary output with 58.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 51.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arkansas State, South Alabama.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · South Alabama
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
16
Efficiency
51.9
Usage
10.1
Consistency
59.9
Best Game by takeover score
Texas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 32. Tulane: 29. Coastal Carolina: 5. North Texas: 20. Arkansas State: 7. Louisiana: 17. Southern Miss: 12. Texas State: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 100. Tulane: 4 by 48.3. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 16.7. North Texas: 2 by 66.7. Arkansas State: 1 by 46.7. Louisiana: 2 by 56.7. Southern Miss: 2 by 40. Texas State: 1 by 40
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses14 · Games = 6
First Half21.5 · Games = 4 · +11 vs Second Half
Second Half10.5 · Games = 4 · -11 vs First Half
All Games16 · Games = 8
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas State | L 26-49 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Southern Miss | W 42-35 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Louisiana | L 22-31 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Tue 10/14 | vs Arkansas State | L 14-15 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ North Texas | L 22-36 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Coastal Carolina | L 20-38 | — | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Tulane | L 31-33 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 32 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas State
2022-2024
Opening stop
- 2
South Alabama
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 9 | 60 | 4 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Arkansas State | 129 | 58.7 | 8.7 | 120 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 129 | 58.7 | 8.7 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 79 | 52.4 | 7.1 | -50 |
| 2025 Regular Season | South Alabama | 128 | 51.9 | 10.1 | 49 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
32
Primary metric
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
30
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#3
Massachusetts
21
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
South Alabama
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Arkansas State
129 primary output · 58.7 efficiency · 8.7 usage
58.8
#2
2023 Regular Season · Arkansas State
58.8
129 primary · 58.7 efficiency · 8.7 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · South Alabama
55.1
128 primary · 51.9 efficiency · 10.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.83
Bishop Moore Catholic · Orlando, FL
- Committed To
- Missouri State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
345
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.