Player Stats

Quinn Ewers College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
9,020
Passing yards
9,079
Touchdowns
76

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2022 PostseasonTexas103263206151.3
2022 Regular SeasonTexas101,7501,808-581551.3
2023 PostseasonTexas1237231854168.7
2023 Regular SeasonTexas123,1823,161212668.7
2024 PostseasonTexas14787807-20766
2024 Regular SeasonTexas142,6032,665-622666

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Texas paired 3,554 primary output with 63.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 58.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State

Win with 323 yards of offense and 61.1 efficiency. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Texas

Games

14

Primary Metric / G

242.1

Efficiency

58.6

Usage

12.3

Consistency

82.8

Best Game by takeover score

Arizona State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 265. Arizona State: 323. Clemson: 199. Colorado State: 254. Michigan: 246. UTSA: 192. Oklahoma: 202. Georgia: 177. Vanderbilt: 268. Florida: 333. Arkansas: 171. Kentucky: 182. Texas A&M: 247. Georgia: 331

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 44 by 52.3. Arizona State: 36 by 61.1. Clemson: 28 by 56.1. Colorado State: 28 by 59.9. Michigan: 40 by 55.9. UTSA: 17 by 82.2. Oklahoma: 33 by 55. Georgia: 49 by 47.4. Vanderbilt: 42 by 54.1. Florida: 29 by 67.6. Arkansas: 37 by 52.1. Kentucky: 35 by 54. Texas A&M: 32 by 71. Georgia: 52 by 51.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins237.9 · Games = 11 · -19.8 vs Losses
Losses257.7 · Games = 3 · +19.8 vs Wins