Usage Score
11.7
Player Dossier
2009-2012Penn State
WR • 6'1" • Woodbury, NJ, USA
Shawney Kersey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11.7
Efficiency
53.4
Consistency
63.6
Season Value
41.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Penn State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shawney Kersey, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Penn State. Shawney Kersey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Shawney Kersey played WR for Penn State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Shawney Kersey recorded 24 rushing yards and 154 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Penn State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Penn State paired 108 primary output with 90 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 53.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
22
Efficiency
53.4
Usage
11.7
Consistency
63.6
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 35. Virginia: 9
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
60 vs Virginia
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Penn State
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Penn State | 2 | 13.3 | 5.9 | 2 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Penn State | 2 | 13.3 | 5.9 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Penn State | 108 | 90 | 8.4 | 106 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Penn State | 44 | 53.4 | 11.7 | -64 |
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41
Primary metric
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Indiana
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Alabama
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ohio
35
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Minnesota
2
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
2 receiving yards with a 13.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Penn State
108 primary output · 90 efficiency · 8.4 usage
64.4
#2
2012 Regular Season · Penn State
41.9
44 primary · 53.4 efficiency · 11.7 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Penn State
6.6
2 primary · 13.3 efficiency · 5.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.76
Skyview · Vancouver, WA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
154
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.