Usage Score
18.8
Player Dossier
2009-2012Penn State
Justin Brown
WR • 6'3" • Wilmington, DE, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Justin Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.6
Consistency
64.5
Season Value
64.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Oklahoma
0909101011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Penn State • Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Brown, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Oklahoma. Justin Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 879 primary output with 75.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Penn State, Oklahoma.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
67.6
Efficiency
75.6
Usage
18.8
Consistency
64.5
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 57. UTEP: 32. Unknown: 55. Kansas State: 48. Texas Tech: 19. Texas: 73. Kansas: 72. Notre Dame: 48. Iowa State: 107. Baylor: 83. West Virginia: 112. Oklahoma State: 146. TCU: 27
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 7 by 54.3. UTEP: 4 by 53.3. Unknown: 2 by 100. Kansas State: 6 by 53.3. Texas Tech: 3 by 42.2. Texas: 5 by 97.3. Kansas: 4 by 100. Notre Dame: 4 by 80. Iowa State: 7 by 100. Baylor: 6 by 92.2. West Virginia: 6 by 100. Oklahoma State: 15 by 64.9. TCU: 4 by 45
Split Comparison
Wins74.6 · n=9 · +23.6 vs Losses
Losses51 · n=3 · -23.6 vs Wins
First Half50.9 · n=7 · -36.3 vs Second Half
Second Half87.2 · n=6 · +36.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
100 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/5 | vs Texas A&M | L 13-41 | — | 7 | 57 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 12/1 | @ TCU | W 24-17 | — | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Oklahoma State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 51-48 | — | 15 | 146 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ West Virginia100 receiving yards | W 50-49 | — | 6 | 112 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Baylor | W 42-34 | — | 6 | 83 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Iowa State100 receiving yards | W 35-20 | — | 7 | 107 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 40 |
| Sun 10/28 | vs Notre Dame | L 13-30 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Kansas | W 52-7 | — | 4 | 72 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Texas | W 63-21 | — | 5 | 73 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Texas Tech | W 41-20 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Kansas State | L 19-24 | — | 6 | 48 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 55 | 27.5 | 27.50 | 0 | 46 |
| Sun 9/2 | @ UTEP | W 24-7 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Penn State
2009-2011
Opening stop
- 2
Oklahoma
2012
Final stop
Season Progression
20092009201020102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Penn State | 78 | 80 | 9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Penn State | 78 | 80 | 9 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Penn State | 452 | 78.8 | 15.8 | 374 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Penn State | 452 | 78.8 | 15.8 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Penn State | 517 | 83.8 | 19.6 | 65 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Penn State | 517 | 83.8 | 19.6 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Oklahoma | 879 | 75.6 | 18.8 | 362 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 879 | 75.6 | 18.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86
Primary metric
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Michigan State
106
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
45
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Temple
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma State
146
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 64.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Oklahoma
879 primary output · 75.6 efficiency · 18.8 usage
64.7
#2
2012 Regular Season · Oklahoma
64.7
879 primary · 75.6 efficiency · 18.8 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Penn State
58.7
517 primary · 83.8 efficiency · 19.6 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.9272
Concord · Wilmington, DE
- Committed To
- Penn State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,926
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.