Usage Score
14.7
Player Dossier
2009-2013Penn State
Devon Smith
WR • 5'7" • White Plains, MD, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Devon Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
92.3
Consistency
66.2
Season Value
68.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Marshall
0910101111121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Penn State • Marshall
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devon Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Marshall. Devon Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Marshall paired 653 primary output with 92.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 92.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Penn State, Marshall.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Marshall
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
50.2
Efficiency
92.3
Usage
14.7
Consistency
66.2
Best Game by takeover score
Maryland
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Maryland: 54. Miami (OH): 75. Unknown: 29. Ohio: 78. Virginia Tech: 68. UTSA: 69. Florida Atlantic: 50. Middle Tennessee: 0. Southern Miss: 64. Tulsa: 114. Florida International: 0. East Carolina: 28. Rice: 24
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Maryland: 5 by 72. Miami (OH): 3 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 96.7. Ohio: 4 by 100. Virginia Tech: 4 by 100. UTSA: 4 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 100. Southern Miss: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 7 by 100. East Carolina: 2 by 93.3. Rice: 3 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins56.8 · n=8 · +14.3 vs Losses
Losses42.5 · n=4 · -14.3 vs Wins
First Half60.4 · n=7 · +22.1 vs Second Half
Second Half38.3 · n=6 · -22.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | @ Maryland | W 31-20 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Rice | L 24-41 | — | 3 | 24 | 7.8 | 8 | 1 | 12 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs East Carolina | W 59-28 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Florida International | W 48-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/15 | @ Tulsa100 receiving yards | W 45-34 | — | 7 | 114 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Southern Miss | W 61-13 | — | 2 | 64 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 58 |
| Thu 10/24 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 49-51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 24-23 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs UTSA | W 34-10 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Virginia Tech | L 21-29 | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 47 |
| Sun 9/15 | @ Ohio | L 31-34 | — | 4 | 78 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Miami (OH) | W 52-14 | — | 3 | 75 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 54 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Penn State
2009-2011
Opening stop
- 2
Marshall
2012-2013
Final stop
Season Progression
20092010201020112011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Penn State | 30 | 38.9 | 6.5 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Penn State | 363 | 69.7 | 13.9 | 333 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Penn State | 363 | 69.7 | 13.9 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Penn State | 402 | 76.1 | 18.8 | 39 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Penn State | 402 | 76.1 | 18.8 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Marshall | 0 | — | — | -402 |
| 2013 Postseason | Marshall | 653 | 92.3 | 14.7 | 653 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Marshall | 653 | 92.3 | 14.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110
Primary metric
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulsa
114
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Kent State
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Marshall
653 primary output · 92.3 efficiency · 14.7 usage
68.3
#2
2013 Regular Season · Marshall
68.3
653 primary · 92.3 efficiency · 14.7 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Penn State
50.1
363 primary · 69.7 efficiency · 13.9 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.75
Geneva Sch · Geneva, AL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,448
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.