Player Stats

Jamari Sharpe College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
83
TFL
6.5
Sacks
0.5
Passes defended
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonIndiana00-0--0-
2023 Regular SeasonIndiana112110-2019.8
2024 PostseasonIndiana640.50.5--038.2
2024 Regular SeasonIndiana69-0-6038.2
2025 PostseasonIndiana151210-1051.4
2025 Regular SeasonIndiana153740-4051.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Indiana paired 11 primary output with 20.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 20.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Indiana

Games

15

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

20.9

Usage

5.6

Consistency

38.3

Best Game by takeover score

Miami

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112131415

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami: 2. Oregon: 1. Alabama: 0. Kennesaw State: 0. Indiana State: 0.5. Illinois: 0. Iowa: 1. Oregon: 2. Michigan State: 0. UCLA: 0. Maryland: 0.5. Penn State: 2. Wisconsin: 1. Purdue: 1. Ohio State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 6 by 45. Oregon: 3 by 22.5. Alabama: 3 by 12.5. Kennesaw State: 1 by 4.2. Indiana State: 3 by 17.5. Illinois: 3 by 12.5. Iowa: 5 by 30.8. Oregon: 2 by 28.3. Michigan State: 3 by 12.5. UCLA: 4 by 16.7. Maryland: 3 by 17.5. Penn State: 4 by 36.7. Wisconsin: 3 by 22.5. Purdue: 4 by 26.7. Ohio State: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half0.8 · Games = 8 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · Games = 7 · -0.2 vs First Half