Usage Score
9.6
Player Dossier
2023-2025Middle Tennessee
LB • 6'1" • 225 lbs • Elizabethton, TN, USA
Parker Hughes shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
9.6
Efficiency
40.7
Consistency
40.4
Season Value
39.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2023 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Parker Hughes, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2023 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee. Parker Hughes shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.7 disruption score.
Parker Hughes played LB for Middle Tennessee. Across 3 tracked seasons, Parker Hughes recorded 211 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Middle Tennessee.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Middle Tennessee paired 12.5 primary output with 28.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 40.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Austin Peay
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
40.7
Usage
9.6
Consistency
40.4
Best Game by takeover score
Austin Peay
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Austin Peay: 2. Wisconsin: 0.5. Nevada: 1. Marshall: 0. Kennesaw State: 1. Missouri State: 0.5. Delaware: 0.5. Florida International: 0. Western Kentucky: 1. Sam Houston: 2. New Mexico State: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Austin Peay: 9 by 57.5. Wisconsin: 5 by 25.8. Nevada: 7 by 39.2. Marshall: 14 by 50. Kennesaw State: 7 by 39.2. Missouri State: 4 by 21.7. Delaware: 8 by 38.3. Florida International: 5 by 20.8. Western Kentucky: 11 by 55.8. Sam Houston: 7 by 49.2. New Mexico State: 12 by 50
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Austin Peay
Best efficiency game
57.5 vs Austin Peay
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ New Mexico State10+ tackles | W 31-24 | 12 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Sam HoustonSplash game | W 31-17 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Western Kentucky10+ tackles | L 26-42 | 11 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Florida International | L 30-56 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 10/22 | @ Delaware | L 28-31 | 8 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 10/8 | vs Missouri State | L 20-22 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Kennesaw State | L 16-24 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Marshall10+ tackles | L 28-42 | 14 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Nevada | W 14-13 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Wisconsin | L 10-42 | 5 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Austin PeaySplash game | L 14-34 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Middle Tennessee
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 12.5 | 28.8 | 7.6 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 3 | 34.4 | 7.3 | -9.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 8.5 | 40.7 | 9.6 | 5.5 |
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 62 takeover score.
#2
UTEP
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.7 takeover score.
#3
Austin Peay
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.7 takeover score.
#4
Sam Houston
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54 takeover score.
#5
Louisiana Tech
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2023 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
12.5 primary output · 28.8 efficiency · 7.6 usage
45
#2
2025 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
39.7
8.5 primary · 40.7 efficiency · 9.6 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
18.3
3 primary · 34.4 efficiency · 7.3 usage
1
Impact games
7
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
211
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 32 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.