Player Stats

Tyrone Howell College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,540
Receptions
106
Touchdowns
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonKansas State6798043.1
2022 Regular SeasonUL Monroe1250852669.8
2023 Regular SeasonUL Monroe1249590779.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

UL Monroe paired 590 primary output with 79.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 79.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kansas State, UL Monroe.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Lamar

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · UL Monroe

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

49.2

Efficiency

79.2

Usage

29.4

Consistency

70.7

Best Game by takeover score

Lamar

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Army: 67. Lamar: 65. Texas A&M: 40. App State: 62. South Alabama: 41. Texas State: 38. Georgia Southern: 48. Arkansas State: 37. Southern Miss: 25. Troy: 93. Ole Miss: 34. Louisiana: 40

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 9 by 49.6. Lamar: 4 by 100. Texas A&M: 2 by 100. App State: 8 by 51.7. South Alabama: 4 by 68.3. Texas State: 2 by 100. Georgia Southern: 3 by 100. Arkansas State: 5 by 49.3. Southern Miss: 3 by 55.6. Troy: 4 by 100. Ole Miss: 3 by 75.6. Louisiana: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins66 · Games = 2 · +20.2 vs Losses
Losses45.8 · Games = 10 · -20.2 vs Wins