Usage Score
2.1
Player Dossier
2021-2024Army
Dre Miller
DL • 6'3" • 265 lbs • Savannah, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Dre Miller shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
9.2
Consistency
100
Season Value
37.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Army
2122232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Army
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dre Miller, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Army. Dre Miller shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.2 disruption score.
Dre Miller played DL for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Dre Miller recorded 28 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Army.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Army paired 0 primary output with 9.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 9.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Army
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
9.2
Usage
2.1
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana Tech: 0. Unknown: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. Tulsa: 0. UAB: 0. East Carolina: 0. Air Force: 0. Notre Dame: 0. Tulane: 0. Navy: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 16.7. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 4.2. Tulsa: 1 by 4.2. UAB: 2 by 8.3. East Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Air Force: 2 by 8.3. Notre Dame: 3 by 12.5. Tulane: 4 by 16.7. Navy: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 7 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 2 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0 · Games = 5 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 5 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
16.7 vs Louisiana Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/29 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 27-6 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/14 | vs Navy | L 13-31 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Tulane | W 35-14 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Notre Dame | L 14-49 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Air Force | W 20-3 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs East Carolina | W 45-28 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs UAB | W 44-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Tulsa | W 49-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 24-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2021-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
20212022202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 4.2 | 1 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Army | 0 | 9.2 | 2.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 9.2 | 2.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisiana Tech
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Primary metric
0 disruption/tackle impact with 7.1 takeover score.
#2
Tulane
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 6.8 takeover score.
#3
Notre Dame
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 5.2 takeover score.
#4
UL Monroe
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.4 takeover score.
#5
East Carolina
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Army
0 primary output · 9.2 efficiency · 2.1 usage
37.1
#2
2024 Regular Season · Army
37.1
0 primary · 9.2 efficiency · 2.1 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Army
35.1
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 1 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8206
Savannah Country Day School · Savannah, GA
- Committed To
- Army
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
28
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.