Usage Score
4.8
Player Dossier
2022-2025Army
RB • 5'11" • 214 lbs • Trenton, TN, USA
Jarel Dickson leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Usage Score
4.8
Efficiency
32.9
Consistency
43.1
Season Value
44.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jarel Dickson, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Army. Jarel Dickson leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Jarel Dickson played RB for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jarel Dickson recorded 40 rushing yards. His top tracked season came in 2022 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Army paired 40 primary output with 32.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 32.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 24 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Scrimmage Yards / G
10
Efficiency
32.9
Usage
4.8
Consistency
43.1
Best Game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 3. Wake Forest: 10. Unknown: 24. Massachusetts: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 31.3. Wake Forest: 3 by 34.7. Unknown: 5 by 50. Massachusetts: 2 by 15.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
50 vs Unknown
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Army | 40 | 32.9 | 4.8 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | -40 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 24 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
24
Primary metric
24 scrimmage yards and 9.1 usage.
#2
Wake Forest
10
Primary metric
Loss with 10 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
10 scrimmage yards and 4.8 usage.
#3
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
3 scrimmage yards and 1.8 usage.
#4
Massachusetts
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
3 scrimmage yards and 3.4 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Army
40 primary output · 32.9 efficiency · 4.8 usage
44.6
#2
2023 Regular Season · Army
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Army
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.7783
Peabody · Trenton, TN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
40
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.