Player Stats

Bryson Daily College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
4,638
Passing yards
1,920
Rushing yards
2,718
Touchdowns
57

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonArmy41630163233.5
2023 Regular SeasonArmy111,8159139021473.6
2024 PostseasonArmy1319265127384.9
2024 Regular SeasonArmy132,4689421,5263884.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Army paired 2,660 primary output with 67.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 67.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Army

Games

13

Primary Metric / G

204.6

Efficiency

67.4

Usage

43.1

Consistency

76.6

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Louisiana Tech: 192. Lehigh: 113. Florida Atlantic: 161. Rice: 252. Temple: 206. Tulsa: 250. UAB: 238. East Carolina: 318. North Texas: 168. Notre Dame: 165. UTSA: 337. Tulane: 143. Navy: 117

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 36 by 57.4. Lehigh: 23 by 61.1. Florida Atlantic: 22 by 70.4. Rice: 32 by 82.2. Temple: 30 by 67.9. Tulsa: 18 by 96.2. UAB: 19 by 85.7. East Carolina: 41 by 81.3. North Texas: 40 by 30.9. Notre Dame: 47 by 53.2. UTSA: 44 by 76.6. Tulane: 27 by 80.3. Navy: 35 by 32.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins216.2 · Games = 11 · +75.2 vs Losses
Losses141 · Games = 2 · -75.2 vs Wins