Player Stats

Tavon Austin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
3,413
Receptions
288
Touchdowns
40

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2009 PostseasonWest Virginia13119033.5
2009 Regular SeasonWest Virginia1314132333.5
2010 PostseasonWest Virginia13530068.5
2010 Regular SeasonWest Virginia1353757968.5
2011 PostseasonWest Virginia1312123483.5
2011 Regular SeasonWest Virginia13891,063783.5
2012 PostseasonWest Virginia13430085.5
2012 Regular SeasonWest Virginia131101,2591785.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

West Virginia paired 1,289 primary output with 70.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 70.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Baylor

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · West Virginia

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

99.2

Efficiency

70.9

Usage

29.4

Consistency

73

Best Game by takeover score

Baylor

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Syracuse: 30. Marshall: 53. James Madison: 113. Maryland: 179. Baylor: 215. Texas: 102. Texas Tech: 92. Kansas State: 34. TCU: 101. Oklahoma State: 79. Oklahoma: 82. Iowa State: 99. Kansas: 110

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Syracuse: 4 by 50. Marshall: 10 by 35.3. James Madison: 11 by 68.5. Maryland: 13 by 91.8. Baylor: 14 by 100. Texas: 10 by 68. Texas Tech: 10 by 61.3. Kansas State: 6 by 37.8. TCU: 11 by 61.2. Oklahoma State: 11 by 47.9. Oklahoma: 4 by 100. Iowa State: 6 by 100. Kansas: 4 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins124.4 · Games = 7 · +54.8 vs Losses
Losses69.7 · Games = 6 · -54.8 vs Wins