Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2013UConn
RB • 6'0" • Wakefield, MA, USA
Martin Hyppolite leans balanced backfield option traits and 50.7 efficiency.
Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
12
Developing production for a back
Reliability
6
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
30
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · UConn
Snapshot
Martin Hyppolite, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · UConn. Martin Hyppolite leans balanced backfield option traits and 50.7 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | UConn | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2010 Regular Season | UConn | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 33.4 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UConn | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Regular Season | UConn | 6 | 79 | 69 | 10 | 1 | 27.9 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UConn | 10 | 160 | 160 | 0 | 1 | 51.6 |
Related Context
Martin Hyppolite played RB for UConn. Across 5 tracked seasons, Martin Hyppolite recorded 234 rushing yards, 10 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with UConn.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
UConn paired 160 primary output with 50.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 50.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Loss with 40 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
16
Efficiency
50.7
Usage
6.3
Consistency
37.9
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Maryland: 1. Michigan: 7. Buffalo: 29. South Florida: 8. Cincinnati: 40. UCF: 7. Louisville: 10. Temple: 19. Rutgers: 4. Memphis: 35
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Maryland: 1 by 10.4. Michigan: 1 by 72.9. Buffalo: 8 by 37.8. South Florida: 3 by 27.8. Cincinnati: 6 by 69.4. UCF: 3 by 24.3. Louisville: 1 by 91.7. Temple: 1 by 100. Rutgers: 2 by 20.8. Memphis: 7 by 52.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/7 | vs Memphis | W 45-10 | 7 | 35 | 5 | 1 | — | — | 5 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Rutgers | W 28-17 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Temple | W 28-21 | 1 | 19 | 19 | 0 | — | — | 19 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Louisville | L 10-31 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | — | — | 10 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ UCF | L 17-62 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Cincinnati | L 16-41 | 6 | 40 | 6.70 | 0 | — | — | 6.7 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs South Florida | L 10-13 | 3 | 8 | 2.70 | 0 | — | — | 2.7 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Buffalo | L 12-41 | 8 | 29 | 3.60 | 0 | — | — | 3.6 |
| Sun 9/22 | vs Michigan | L 21-24 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | — | — | 7 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Maryland | L 21-32 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UConn
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | UConn | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | UConn | 5 | 17.4 | 4.5 | 5 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UConn | 0 | — | — | -5 |
| 2012 Regular Season | UConn | 79 | 26.9 | 6.4 | 79 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UConn | 160 | 50.7 | 6.3 | 81 |
#1 Featured game
vs Buffalo
Week 5 · W 24-17
Win with 60 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
60
Scrimmage Yards
74.1 takeover
60 scrimmage yards and 10.7 usage.
#2
@ Cincinnati
Week 8 · L 16-41 · Conference game
40
Scrimmage Yards
66.8 takeover
Loss with 40 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
40 scrimmage yards and 10.9 usage.
#3
vs Memphis
Week 15 · W 45-10 · Conference game
35
Scrimmage Yards
57.1 takeover
Win with 35 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
35 scrimmage yards and 11.1 usage.
#4
@ Buffalo
Week 5 · L 12-41
29
Scrimmage Yards
52 takeover
Loss with 29 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
29 scrimmage yards and 16 usage.
#5
@ Temple
Week 13 · W 28-21 · Conference game
19
Scrimmage Yards
51.2 takeover
Win with 19 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
19 scrimmage yards and 2.1 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · UConn
160 primary output · 50.7 efficiency · 6.3 usage
51.6
#2
2010 Regular Season · UConn
33.4
5 primary · 17.4 efficiency · 4.5 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · UConn
27.9
79 primary · 26.9 efficiency · 6.4 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.