Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2009-2013Ohio State
Jordan Hall
? • 5'9" • Jeannette, PA, USA
Impact contributor
Jordan Hall shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
6.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Ohio State
0910101111121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Ohio State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Hall, ?. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Ohio State. Jordan Hall shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Jordan Hall played ? for Ohio State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jordan Hall recorded 20 passing yards, 1,568 rushing yards, and 286 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Ohio State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Ohio State paired 5 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
0.7
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 0. Buffalo: 2. San Diego State: 1. California: 3. Unknown: 2. Wisconsin: 0. Iowa: 0. Penn State: 0. Illinois: 0. Indiana: 0. Michigan: 0. Michigan State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins22.2 · Games = 9 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 2 · -0.7 vs Wins
First Half44.4 · Games = 6 · +1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 6 · -1.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
— vs Clemson
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/4 | vs Clemson | L 35-40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 12/8 | @ Michigan State | L 24-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Michigan | W 42-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Indiana | W 42-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Illinois | W 60-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/27 | vs Penn State | W 63-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 81 | 10.10 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Iowa | W 34-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 11 | 5.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 9/29 | vs Wisconsin | W 31-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 20 | 5 | 2 | 18 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ California | W 52-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30 | 168 | 5.60 | 3 | 36 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs San Diego State | W 42-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13 | 75 | 5.80 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Buffalo | W 40-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21 | 159 | 7.60 | 2 | 49 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201020112011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio State | 1 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Ohio State | 4 | — | — | 3 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio State | 4 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Ohio State | 5 | — | — | 1 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio State | 5 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio State | 1 | — | — | -4 |
| 2013 Postseason | Ohio State | 8 | — | — | 7 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio State | 8 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Eastern Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
Purdue
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Michigan State
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
California
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Ohio State
5 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
7.1
#2
2011 Regular Season · Ohio State
7.1
5 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Ohio State
6.2
8 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
7
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8933
Jeannette · Jeannette, PA
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
20
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.