Player Dossier

2022-2024

Indiana

Zach Horton

TE • 6'4" • 254 lbs • Roanoke, VA, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Zach Horton reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

10.9

Efficiency

64.5

Consistency

67.5

Season Value

52.9

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · James Madison

2223232424

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
5
Program Path
James Madison • Indiana
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Zach Horton, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · James Madison. Zach Horton reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Zach Horton played TE for James Madison and Indiana. Across 3 tracked seasons, Zach Horton recorded 623 receiving yards, 1 tackles, and 12 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2023 with James Madison.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

James Madison paired 159 primary output with 75.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 64.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across James Madison, Indiana.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida International

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Indiana

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

18.9

Efficiency

64.5

Usage

10.9

Consistency

67.5

Best Game by takeover score

Notre Dame

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 7. Florida International: 36. UCLA: 31. Maryland: 18. Northwestern: 4. Nebraska: 21. Washington: 14. Michigan State: 17. Michigan: 15. Purdue: 26

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 1 by 46.7. Florida International: 3 by 80. UCLA: 4 by 51.7. Maryland: 1 by 100. Northwestern: 1 by 26.7. Nebraska: 4 by 35. Washington: 2 by 46.7. Michigan State: 1 by 100. Michigan: 1 by 100. Purdue: 3 by 57.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins20.2 · Games = 9
First Half19.2 · Games = 5 · +0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half18.6 · Games = 5 · -0.6 vs First Half
All Games18.9 · Games = 10

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

10 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Florida International

Best efficiency game

100 vs Michigan

Result
Sat 12/21@ Notre DameL 17-27177707
Sun 12/1vs PurdueW 66-03268.78.70113
Sat 11/9vs MichiganW 20-151151515015
Sat 11/2@ Michigan StateW 47-101171717117
Sat 10/26vs WashingtonW 31-172147708
Sat 10/19vs NebraskaW 56-74215.35.30011
Sat 10/5@ NorthwesternW 41-24144414
Sat 9/28vs MarylandW 42-281181818018
Sat 9/14@ UCLAW 42-134317.87.80017
Sat 8/31vs Florida InternationalW 31-73361212114

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    James Madison

    2022-2023

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Indiana

    2024

    Final stop

Season Progression

20222023202320242024
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2022 Regular SeasonJames Madison15975.911.4
2023 PostseasonJames Madison27556.312.4116
2023 Regular SeasonJames Madison27556.312.40
2024 PostseasonIndiana18964.510.9-86
2024 Regular SeasonIndiana18964.510.90

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

South Alabama

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

116

Primary metric

116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Arkansas State

47

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Florida International

36

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

36 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.

#4

Georgia State

32

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Marshall

31

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

31 receiving yards with a 68.9 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2022 Regular Season · James Madison

159 primary output · 75.9 efficiency · 11.4 usage

54.8

#2

2024 Postseason · Indiana

52.9

189 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 10.9 usage

#3

2024 Regular Season · Indiana

52.9

189 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 10.9 usage

Milestones

1

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

2

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2021 · Rating 0.8167

Northside · Roanoke, VA

Committed To
James Madison
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2021

Career Facts

2

Career teams

5

Seasons tracked

623

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.