Usage Score
18.6
Player Dossier
2023-2025Pittsburgh
WR • 5'10" • 165 lbs • Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Raphael Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.6
Efficiency
80.3
Consistency
65.7
Season Value
66.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Raphael Williams, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Raphael Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Raphael Williams played WR for San Diego State and Pittsburgh. Across 3 tracked seasons, Raphael Williams recorded 1 rushing yards, 1,160 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 741 primary output with 80.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across San Diego State, Pittsburgh.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
57
Efficiency
80.3
Usage
18.6
Consistency
65.7
Best Game by takeover score
West Virginia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. East Carolina: 57. Duquesne: 45. Central Michigan: 121. West Virginia: 119. Louisville: 57. Boston College: 18. Florida State: 78. Syracuse: 28. NC State: 62. Stanford: 37. Notre Dame: 14. Georgia Tech: 39. Miami: 66
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Carolina: 5 by 76. Duquesne: 1 by 100. Central Michigan: 6 by 100. West Virginia: 6 by 100. Louisville: 4 by 95. Boston College: 2 by 60. Florida State: 6 by 86.7. Syracuse: 3 by 62.2. NC State: 5 by 82.7. Stanford: 4 by 61.7. Notre Dame: 3 by 31.1. Georgia Tech: 2 by 100. Miami: 5 by 88
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
West Virginia
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | @ East Carolina | L 17-23 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Miami | L 7-38 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 38 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Georgia Tech | W 42-28 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Notre Dame | L 15-37 | — | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 4.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Stanford | W 35-20 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs NC State | W 53-34 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Syracuse | W 30-13 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Florida State | W 34-31 | — | 6 | 78 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Boston College | W 48-7 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Louisville | L 27-34 | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ West Virginia100 receiving yards | L 24-31 | — | 6 | 119 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 1 | 67 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Central Michigan100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-17 | — | 6 | 121 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 2 | 48 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Duquesne | W 61-9 | — | 1 | 45 | 24.5 | 45 | 0 | 45 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
San Diego State
2023
Opening stop
Pittsburgh
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | San Diego State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 419 | 76.7 | 13.1 | 419 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 419 | 76.7 | 13.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 741 | 80.3 | 18.6 | 322 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 741 | 80.3 | 18.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Georgia Tech
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
22
Primary metric
22 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#2
West Virginia
119
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Central Michigan
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Youngstown State
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma
5
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Pittsburgh
741 primary output · 80.3 efficiency · 18.6 usage
66.1
#2
2025 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
66.1
741 primary · 80.3 efficiency · 18.6 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Pittsburgh
53.9
419 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 13.1 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,160
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 27 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.