Player Stats

Garland Benyard College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
85
TFL
10
Sacks
3.5
QB hurries
7
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2024 Regular SeasonKennesaw State114893.55-063.8
2025 Regular SeasonKennesaw State7371021039.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Kennesaw State paired 17.5 primary output with 32.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 27.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Indiana

Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Kennesaw State

Games

7

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

27.7

Usage

6.9

Consistency

48.7

Best Game by takeover score

Indiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 0. Indiana: 1. Merrimack: 0.5. Arkansas State: 1. Middle Tennessee: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1.5. Florida International: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 5 by 20.8. Indiana: 5 by 30.8. Merrimack: 4 by 21.7. Arkansas State: 6 by 35. Middle Tennessee: 6 by 25. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 40. Florida International: 5 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.6 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 2 · -0.1 vs Wins