Player Stats

Donovan Brown College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
321
Receptions
27
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonSyracuse1-00100
2023 PostseasonSyracuse11212067.3
2023 Regular SeasonSyracuse1125309167.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Syracuse paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 62.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Syracuse

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

29.2

Efficiency

62.1

Usage

17.6

Consistency

48.2

Best Game by takeover score

Western Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Florida: 12. Colgate: 65. Western Michigan: 89. Purdue: 52. Army: 33. Clemson: 34. North Carolina: 25. Florida State: 0. Virginia Tech: 7. Boston College: 0. Georgia Tech: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Florida: 2 by 40. Colgate: 5 by 86.7. Western Michigan: 3 by 100. Purdue: 4 by 86.7. Army: 3 by 73.3. Clemson: 4 by 56.7. North Carolina: 3 by 55.6. Virginia Tech: 1 by 46.7. Georgia Tech: 2 by 13.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins59.8 · Games = 4 · +48.0 vs Losses
Losses11.7 · Games = 7 · -48.0 vs Wins