Usage Score
18
Player Dossier
2009-2015BYU
Mitch Mathews
WR • 6'6" • Beaverton, OR, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Mitch Mathews reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.4
Consistency
63
Season Value
60.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · BYU
091011121314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- BYU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mitch Mathews, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · BYU. Mitch Mathews reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
BYU paired 922 primary output with 73.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · BYU
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
56.7
Efficiency
73.4
Usage
18
Consistency
63
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah: 8. Nebraska: 69. Boise State: 32. UCLA: 84. Michigan: 4. UConn: 78. East Carolina: 72. Cincinnati: 54. Unknown: 44. San José State: 62. Missouri: 20. Fresno State: 52. Utah State: 158
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 2 by 26.7. Nebraska: 3 by 100. Boise State: 5 by 42.7. UCLA: 9 by 62.2. Michigan: 1 by 26.7. UConn: 8 by 65. East Carolina: 4 by 100. Cincinnati: 3 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 97.8. San José State: 4 by 100. Missouri: 4 by 33.3. Fresno State: 2 by 100. Utah State: 6 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins72.1 · n=8 · +43.1 vs Losses
Losses29 · n=4 · -43.1 vs Wins
First Half49.6 · n=7 · -15.4 vs Second Half
Second Half65 · n=6 · +15.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/19 | @ Utah | L 28-35 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Utah State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 51-28 | — | 6 | 158 | 26.3 | 26.30 | 2 | 72 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Fresno State | W 52-10 | — | 2 | 52 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 45 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ Missouri | L 16-20 | — | 4 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ San José State | W 17-16 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Cincinnati | W 38-24 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs East Carolina | W 45-38 | — | 4 | 72 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs UConnHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 30-13 | — | 8 | 78 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 2 | 21 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Michigan | L 0-31 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ UCLAHigh volume | L 23-24 | — | 9 | 84 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Boise State | W 35-24 | — | 5 | 32 | 6.4 | 6.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Nebraska2+ TD | W 33-28 | — | 3 | 69 | 23 | 23 | 2 | 42 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
BYU
2009-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920102011201220132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | BYU | 27 | 63.4 | 4.5 | 27 |
| 2013 Regular Season | BYU | 397 | 89.6 | 13.9 | 370 |
| 2014 Postseason | BYU | 922 | 73.9 | 24.9 | 525 |
| 2014 Regular Season | BYU | 922 | 73.9 | 24.9 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | BYU | 737 | 73.4 | 18 | -185 |
| 2015 Regular Season | BYU | 737 | 73.4 | 18 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
158
Primary metric
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah State
112
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Nevada
182
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
182 receiving yards with a 75.8 efficiency score.
#4
Utah State
117
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 97.5 efficiency score.
#5
Idaho
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · BYU
922 primary output · 73.9 efficiency · 24.9 usage
64
#2
2014 Regular Season · BYU
64
922 primary · 73.9 efficiency · 24.9 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · BYU
60.3
737 primary · 73.4 efficiency · 18 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.85
Southridge · Beaverton, OR
- Committed To
- BYU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
2,083
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.