Usage Score
26.3
Player Dossier
2009-2013BYU
WR • 6'4" • Crescent City, CA, USA
Cody Hoffman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
26.3
Efficiency
88.3
Consistency
54.4
Season Value
61.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · BYU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cody Hoffman, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · BYU. Cody Hoffman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
BYU paired 1,248 primary output with 79.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
81.3
Efficiency
88.3
Usage
26.3
Consistency
54.4
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 167. Texas: 63. Utah: 108. Utah State: 41. Georgia Tech: 99. Houston: 156. Boise State: 57. Wisconsin: 113. Unknown: 27. Notre Dame: 49. Nevada: 14
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 12 by 92.8. Texas: 2 by 100. Utah: 8 by 90. Utah State: 3 by 91.1. Georgia Tech: 5 by 100. Houston: 7 by 100. Boise State: 4 by 95. Wisconsin: 7 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 90. Notre Dame: 5 by 65.3. Nevada: 2 by 46.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Washington100 receiving yards · High volume | L 16-31 | — | 12 | 167 | 13.9 | 13.90 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Nevada | W 28-23 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Notre Dame | L 13-23 | — | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Wisconsin100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 17-27 | — | 7 | 113 | 16.1 | 16.10 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Boise State | W 37-20 | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Houston100 receiving yards | W 47-46 | — | 7 | 156 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Georgia Tech | W 38-20 | — | 5 | 99 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Utah State | W 31-14 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 9/22 | vs Utah100 receiving yards · High volume | L 13-20 | — | 8 | 108 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Texas | W 40-21 | — | 2 | 63 | 31.5 | 31.50 | 0 | 32 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
BYU
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | BYU | 527 | 71.1 | 18.5 | 527 |
| 2010 Regular Season | BYU | 527 | 71.1 | 18.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | BYU | 943 | 81.2 | 23.8 | 416 |
| 2011 Regular Season | BYU | 943 | 81.2 | 23.8 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | BYU | 1,248 | 79.7 | 33.6 | 305 |
| 2012 Regular Season | BYU | 1,248 | 79.7 | 33.6 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | BYU | 894 | 88.3 | 26.3 | -354 |
| 2013 Regular Season | BYU | 894 | 88.3 | 26.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Oregon State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
162
Primary metric
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Washington
167
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
167 receiving yards with a 92.8 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico State
182
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
182 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTEP
137
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · BYU
1,248 primary output · 79.7 efficiency · 33.6 usage
71.7
#2
2012 Regular Season · BYU
71.7
1,248 primary · 79.7 efficiency · 33.6 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · BYU
62.1
943 primary · 81.2 efficiency · 23.8 usage
18
100+ receiving yards
14
8+ catch outings
8
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7222
Del Norte · Crescent City, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
3,612
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Cody Hoffman quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit