Usage Score
13.2
Player Dossier
2023-2025Alabama
TE • 6'3" • 256 lbs • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Josh Cuevas reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
13.2
Efficiency
72.7
Consistency
69.6
Season Value
63.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Alabama
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Cuevas, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Alabama. Josh Cuevas reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Josh Cuevas played TE for Washington and Alabama. Across 3 tracked seasons, Josh Cuevas recorded 7 rushing yards, 793 receiving yards, and 7 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Alabama.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Alabama paired 411 primary output with 72.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 72.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Washington, Alabama.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
34.3
Efficiency
72.7
Usage
13.2
Consistency
69.6
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 35. Oklahoma: 35. Florida State: 31. UL Monroe: 14. Wisconsin: 22. Georgia: 24. Vanderbilt: 35. Missouri: 28. Tennessee: 33. South Carolina: 16. LSU: 58. Oklahoma: 80
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 4 by 58.3. Oklahoma: 3 by 77.8. Florida State: 3 by 68.9. UL Monroe: 2 by 46.7. Wisconsin: 3 by 48.9. Georgia: 2 by 80. Vanderbilt: 3 by 77.8. Missouri: 2 by 93.3. Tennessee: 2 by 100. South Carolina: 3 by 35.6. LSU: 4 by 96.7. Oklahoma: 6 by 88.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | @ Indiana | L 3-38 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 12/20 | @ Oklahoma | W 34-24 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Oklahoma | L 21-23 | — | 6 | 80 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 25 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs LSU | W 20-9 | — | 4 | 58 | 13 | 14.50 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ South Carolina | W 29-22 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Tennessee | W 37-20 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Missouri | W 27-24 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Vanderbilt | W 30-14 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Georgia | W 24-21 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Wisconsin | W 38-14 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs UL Monroe | W 73-0 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Florida State | L 17-31 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 27 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Washington
2023
Opening stop
Alabama
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Washington | 164 | 100 | 3.6 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Washington | 164 | 100 | 3.6 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Alabama | 218 | 64.6 | 9.6 | 54 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Alabama | 218 | 64.6 | 9.6 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Alabama | 411 | 72.7 | 13.2 | 193 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Alabama | 411 | 72.7 | 13.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Fresno State
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
24
Primary metric
24 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma
80
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
46
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oklahoma
40
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona
57
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Alabama
411 primary output · 72.7 efficiency · 13.2 usage
63.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · Alabama
63.9
411 primary · 72.7 efficiency · 13.2 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Alabama
49.7
218 primary · 64.6 efficiency · 9.6 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
793
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 30 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.