Player Dossier

2023-2025

Alabama

Josh Cuevas

TE • 6'3" • 256 lbs • Los Angeles, CA, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Josh Cuevas reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

13.2

Efficiency

72.7

Consistency

69.6

Season Value

63.9

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Alabama

232324242525

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
Washington • Alabama
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Josh Cuevas, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Alabama. Josh Cuevas reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Josh Cuevas played TE for Washington and Alabama. Across 3 tracked seasons, Josh Cuevas recorded 7 rushing yards, 793 receiving yards, and 7 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Alabama.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Alabama paired 411 primary output with 72.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 72.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Washington, Alabama.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Alabama

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

34.3

Efficiency

72.7

Usage

13.2

Consistency

69.6

Best Game by takeover score

Indiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 35. Oklahoma: 35. Florida State: 31. UL Monroe: 14. Wisconsin: 22. Georgia: 24. Vanderbilt: 35. Missouri: 28. Tennessee: 33. South Carolina: 16. LSU: 58. Oklahoma: 80

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 4 by 58.3. Oklahoma: 3 by 77.8. Florida State: 3 by 68.9. UL Monroe: 2 by 46.7. Wisconsin: 3 by 48.9. Georgia: 2 by 80. Vanderbilt: 3 by 77.8. Missouri: 2 by 93.3. Tennessee: 2 by 100. South Carolina: 3 by 35.6. LSU: 4 by 96.7. Oklahoma: 6 by 88.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins29.4 · Games = 9 · -19.2 vs Losses
Losses48.7 · Games = 3 · +19.2 vs Wins
First Half26.8 · Games = 6 · -14.8 vs Second Half
Second Half41.7 · Games = 6 · +14.8 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Oklahoma

Best efficiency game

100 vs Tennessee

Result
Thu 1/1@ IndianaL 3-384358.88.80016
Sat 12/20@ OklahomaW 34-2433511.711.70023
Sat 11/15vs OklahomaL 21-2368013.313.30125
Sun 11/9vs LSUW 20-94581314.50032
Sat 10/25@ South CarolinaW 29-223165.35.3018
Sat 10/18vs TennesseeW 37-2023316.516.50018
Sat 10/11@ MissouriW 27-242281414021
Sat 10/4vs VanderbiltW 30-1433511.711.70018
Sat 9/27@ GeorgiaW 24-212241212012
Sat 9/13vs WisconsinW 38-143227.37.3009
Sat 9/6vs UL MonroeW 73-021477111
Sat 8/30@ Florida StateL 17-3133110.310.30127

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Washington

    2023

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Alabama

    2024-2025

    Final stop

Season Progression

202320232024202420252025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2023 PostseasonWashington1641003.6
2023 Regular SeasonWashington1641003.60
2024 PostseasonAlabama21864.69.654
2024 Regular SeasonAlabama21864.69.60
2025 PostseasonAlabama41172.713.2193
2025 Regular SeasonAlabama41172.713.20

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Fresno State

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

24

Primary metric

24 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.

#2

Oklahoma

80

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

80 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.

#3

Unknown

46

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Oklahoma

40

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Arizona

57

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2025 Postseason · Alabama

411 primary output · 72.7 efficiency · 13.2 usage

63.9

#2

2025 Regular Season · Alabama

63.9

411 primary · 72.7 efficiency · 13.2 usage

#3

2024 Postseason · Alabama

49.7

218 primary · 64.6 efficiency · 9.6 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

2

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

793

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 30 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.