Usage Score
22.2
Player Dossier
2010-2013Bowling Green
Shaun Joplin
WR • 6'2" • Sylvania, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Shaun Joplin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
92.8
Consistency
63.5
Season Value
69.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Bowling Green
101112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shaun Joplin, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Bowling Green. Shaun Joplin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Bowling Green paired 908 primary output with 92.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 92.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Bowling Green
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
64.9
Efficiency
92.8
Usage
22.2
Consistency
63.5
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 86. Tulsa: 40. Kent State: 113. Indiana: 104. Unknown: 53. Akron: 78. Massachusetts: 25. Mississippi State: 40. Toledo: 64. Miami (OH): 47. Ohio: 71. Eastern Michigan: 23. Buffalo: 149. Northern Illinois: 15
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 6 by 95.6. Tulsa: 2 by 100. Kent State: 6 by 100. Indiana: 7 by 99. Unknown: 3 by 100. Akron: 5 by 100. Massachusetts: 2 by 83.3. Mississippi State: 4 by 66.7. Toledo: 3 by 100. Miami (OH): 4 by 78.3. Ohio: 3 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 76.7. Buffalo: 6 by 100. Northern Illinois: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins62.3 · n=9 · -11.2 vs Losses
Losses73.5 · n=4 · +11.2 vs Wins
First Half71.3 · n=7 · +12.9 vs Second Half
Second Half58.4 · n=7 · -12.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/26 | vs Pittsburgh | L 27-30 | — | 6 | 86 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Northern Illinois | W 47-27 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Buffalo100 receiving yards | W 24-7 | — | 6 | 149 | 24.8 | 24.80 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 58-7 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Wed 11/13 | vs Ohio | W 49-0 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 0 | 43 |
| Wed 11/6 | @ Miami (OH) | W 45-3 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Toledo | L 25-28 | — | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Mississippi State | L 20-21 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Massachusetts | W 28-7 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Akron | W 31-14 | — | 5 | 78 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Indiana100 receiving yards | L 10-42 | — | 7 | 104 | 14.9 | 14.90 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Kent State100 receiving yards | W 41-22 | — | 6 | 113 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 35 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Tulsa | W 34-7 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 11 | 73.3 | 5 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 292 | 84.4 | 9.3 | 281 |
| 2012 Postseason | Bowling Green | 639 | 88.9 | 17 | 347 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 639 | 88.9 | 17 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Bowling Green | 908 | 92.8 | 22.2 | 269 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 908 | 92.8 | 22.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
149
Primary metric
149 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Idaho
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kent State
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
104
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 99 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Bowling Green
908 primary output · 92.8 efficiency · 22.2 usage
69.6
#2
2013 Regular Season · Bowling Green
69.6
908 primary · 92.8 efficiency · 22.2 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Bowling Green
62.8
639 primary · 88.9 efficiency · 17 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,850
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.