Usage Score
10.9
Player Dossier
2021-2025Georgia Tech
DL • 6'3" • 300 lbs • Johannesburg, South Africa
Jordan van den Berg shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.9
Efficiency
25
Consistency
59.7
Season Value
33.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Penn State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan van den Berg, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Penn State. Jordan van den Berg shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25 disruption score.
Jordan van den Berg played DL for Penn State and Georgia Tech. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jordan van den Berg recorded 90 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Georgia Tech.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Penn State paired 1 primary output with 30.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 25 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Penn State, Georgia Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
25
Usage
10.9
Consistency
59.7
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 0. Colorado: 2. Unknown: 1. Clemson: 0. Temple: 2. Wake Forest: 0. Virginia Tech: 2. Duke: 1. Syracuse: 1. NC State: 1. Boston College: 1.5. Pittsburgh: 3. Georgia: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 2 by 8.3. Colorado: 1 by 24.2. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. Clemson: 2 by 8.3. Temple: 3 by 32.5. Wake Forest: 2 by 8.3. Virginia Tech: 2 by 28.3. Duke: 5 by 30.8. Syracuse: 5 by 30.8. NC State: 3 by 22.5. Boston College: 6 by 40. Pittsburgh: 5 by 50.8. Georgia: 3 by 17.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
50.8 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | @ BYU | L 21-25 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Georgia | L 9-16 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/23 | vs PittsburghSplash game | L 28-42 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Boston College | W 36-34 | 6 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ NC State | L 36-48 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Syracuse | W 41-16 | 5 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Duke | W 27-18 | 5 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Virginia Tech | W 35-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Wake Forest | W 30-29 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs TempleSplash game | W 45-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Clemson | W 24-21 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Colorado | W 27-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Penn State
2021-2023
Opening stop
Georgia Tech
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Penn State | 1 | 30.8 | 6.8 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Penn State | 2 | 6.4 | 2.2 | 1 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Penn State | 2 | 6.4 | 2.2 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Penn State | 0.5 | 6.4 | 1.6 | -1.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Penn State | 0.5 | 6.4 | 1.6 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 6 | 15.6 | 7.9 | 5.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 6 | 15.6 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 15 | 25 | 10.9 | 9 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 15 | 25 | 10.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Duke
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.7 takeover score.
#2
Pittsburgh
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.8 takeover score.
#3
Arkansas
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.9 takeover score.
#4
Utah
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.5 takeover score.
#5
Auburn
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 39.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Penn State
1 primary output · 30.8 efficiency · 6.8 usage
35
#2
2025 Postseason · Georgia Tech
33.1
15 primary · 25 efficiency · 10.9 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
33.1
15 primary · 25 efficiency · 10.9 usage
0
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
90
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 41 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.