Usage / Role
59%
Regular defensive contributor
Player Dossier
2021-2025Georgia Tech
DL • 6'3" • 300 lbs • Johannesburg, South Africa
Jordan van den Berg shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.1 disruption score.
Usage / Role
59%
Regular defensive contributor
Impact Production
39
Developing production for a defensive lineman
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
38
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Georgia Tech
Snapshot
Player Story
Jordan van den Berg built his college career from 2021 through 2025 as a defensive lineman from Johannesburg wearing No. 99, spending time with Georgia Tech and Penn State. The clearest part of Jordan van den Berg's...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Jordan van den Berg, DL. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Georgia Tech. Jordan van den Berg shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.1 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Penn State | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 48.2 |
| 2022 Postseason | Penn State | 9 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | 0 | 15.8 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Penn State | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | - | 0 | 15.8 |
| 2023 Postseason | Penn State | 8 | 2 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 10 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Penn State | 8 | 9 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 10 |
| 2024 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 10 | 3 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 38.2 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 10 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 1 | - | 0 | 38.2 |
| 2025 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 13 | 2 | - | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 68 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 13 | 40 | 11 | 4 | 3 | - | 0 | 68 |
Related Context
Transfer Portal History
| Season | Path | Movement | Value | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Penn State to Georgia Tech | P4 to P4 | 82.1 | Mar 11, 2024 |
Jordan van den Berg played DL for Penn State and Georgia Tech. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jordan van den Berg recorded 90 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Georgia Tech.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Georgia Tech paired 19 primary output with 28.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 28.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Penn State, Georgia Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
28.1
Usage
11.4
Consistency
49
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 1. Colorado: 3. Gardner-Webb: 1. Clemson: 0. Temple: 2. Wake Forest: 0. Virginia Tech: 2. Duke: 1. Syracuse: 2. NC State: 1. Boston College: 2.5. Pittsburgh: 3. Georgia: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 2 by 18.3. Colorado: 1 by 34.2. Gardner-Webb: 3 by 22.5. Clemson: 2 by 8.3. Temple: 3 by 32.5. Wake Forest: 2 by 8.3. Virginia Tech: 2 by 28.3. Duke: 5 by 30.8. Syracuse: 5 by 40.8. NC State: 3 by 22.5. Boston College: 6 by 50. Pittsburgh: 5 by 50.8. Georgia: 3 by 17.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
50.8 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | @ BYU | L 21-25 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Georgia | L 9-16 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/23 | vs PittsburghSplash game | L 28-42 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Boston CollegeSplash game | W 36-34 | 6 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ NC State | L 36-48 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs SyracuseSplash game | W 41-16 | 5 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Duke | W 27-18 | 5 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Virginia TechSplash game | W 35-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Wake Forest | W 30-29 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs TempleSplash game | W 45-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Clemson | W 24-21 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Gardner-Webb | W 59-12 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ ColoradoSplash game | W 27-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Jordan van den Berg built his college career from 2021 through 2025 as a defensive lineman from Johannesburg wearing No. 99, spending time with Georgia Tech and Penn State. The clearest part of Jordan van den Berg's career was his defensive production: 90 tackles, 19 tackles for loss, and 5.5 sacks across 41 career games in the available record. That gives Jordan van den Berg's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Penn State
2021-2023
Opening stop
Georgia Tech
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Penn State | 1 | 30.8 | 6.8 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Penn State | 4 | 8.6 | 2.7 | 3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Penn State | 4 | 8.6 | 2.7 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Penn State | 1.5 | 7.6 | 1.9 | -2.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Penn State | 1.5 | 7.6 | 1.9 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 7 | 16.6 | 7.5 | 5.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 7 | 16.6 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 19 | 28.1 | 11.4 | 12 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 19 | 28.1 | 11.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs No. 36 Pittsburgh
Week 13 · L 28-42 · Conference game
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Havoc Plays
83.6 takeover
3 disruption/tackle impact with 83.6 takeover score.
#2
vs Duke
Week 6 · W 24-14 · Conference game
3
Havoc Plays
80.8 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 80.8 takeover score.
#3
@ No. 96 Colorado
Week 1 · W 27-20
3
Havoc Plays
78.1 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 78.1 takeover score.
#4
@ No. 97 Boston College
Week 12 · W 36-34 · Conference game
2.5
Havoc Plays
77.8 takeover
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 77.8 takeover score.
#5
vs No. 115 Syracuse
Week 9 · W 41-16 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
69.2 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 69.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Georgia Tech
19 primary output · 28.1 efficiency · 11.4 usage
68
#2
2025 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
68
19 primary · 28.1 efficiency · 11.4 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Penn State
48.2
1 primary · 30.8 efficiency · 6.8 usage
8
Impact games
8
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.