Usage Score
6.5
Player Dossier
2021-2025Michigan
TE • 6'4" • 260 lbs • Kenmore, WA, USA
Quentin Moore reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
6.5
Efficiency
87.5
Consistency
63
Season Value
64.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Quentin Moore, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Michigan. Quentin Moore reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Michigan paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 87.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Washington.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boise State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
16.6
Efficiency
87.5
Usage
6.5
Consistency
63
Best Game by takeover score
Boise State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boise State: 32. Ohio State: 10. Rutgers: 25. Wisconsin: 16. UCLA: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boise State: 1 by 100. Ohio State: 1 by 66.7. Rutgers: 2 by 83.3. Wisconsin: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Boise State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Boise State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2021
Opening stop
Washington
2021-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Washington | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Washington | 61 | 65.3 | 3.8 | 61 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Washington | 61 | 65.3 | 3.8 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Washington | 10 | 33.3 | 3.4 | -51 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Washington | 14 | 93.3 | 4.3 | 4 |
| 2025 Postseason | Washington | 83 | 87.5 | 6.5 | 69 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Washington | 83 | 87.5 | 6.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Boise State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32
Primary metric
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Colorado
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
14
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Texas
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Michigan
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2021 Regular Season · Washington
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2025 Postseason · Washington
64.3
83 primary · 87.5 efficiency · 6.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8517
Chaminade · West Hills, CA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
168
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 14 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Quentin Moore quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit