Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Kansas State paired 1,601 primary output with 67.1 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Kansas State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2022 Postseason | Kansas State | 13 | 115 | 67 | 48 | 0 | 50.8 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Kansas State | 13 | 501 | 451 | 50 | 6 | 50.8 |
| 2023 Postseason | Kansas State | 13 | 188 | 151 | 37 | 2 | 78.7 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Kansas State | 13 | 1,361 | 1,075 | 286 | 11 | 78.7 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Kansas State | 12 | 1,601 | 1,343 | 258 | 8 | 85.2 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Kansas State paired 1,601 primary output with 67.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 67.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Win with 209 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
133.4
Efficiency
67.1
Usage
36.8
Consistency
73.8
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UT Martin: 130. Tulane: 177. Arizona: 86. BYU: 93. Oklahoma State: 209. Colorado: 220. West Virginia: 110. Kansas: 117. Houston: 66. Arizona State: 139. Cincinnati: 182. Iowa State: 72
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UT Martin: 16 by 83.9. Tulane: 23 by 69.6. Arizona: 17 by 52.7. BYU: 19 by 51. Oklahoma State: 16 by 100. Colorado: 27 by 79.5. West Virginia: 20 by 41.7. Kansas: 19 by 61.1. Houston: 22 by 30.9. Arizona State: 15 by 88.6. Cincinnati: 18 by 92.1. Iowa State: 14 by 53.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.