Player Stats

Phillip Dunnam College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
166
TFL
6.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
13
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonIndiana45-0-108
2023 Regular SeasonIndiana115310-6062.2
2024 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic10482.5014065
2025 Regular SeasonUCF126030-2244.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Florida Atlantic paired 10.5 primary output with 30.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 27.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Indiana, Florida Atlantic, UCF.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Houston

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · UCF

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

27.5

Usage

7

Consistency

13.9

Best Game by takeover score

Houston

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Jacksonville State: 1. North Carolina A&T: 0. North Carolina: 0. Kansas State: 0. Kansas: 0. Cincinnati: 1. West Virginia: 0. Baylor: 2. Houston: 3. Texas Tech: 0. Oklahoma State: 0. BYU: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Jacksonville State: 8 by 43.3. North Carolina A&T: 1 by 4.2. North Carolina: 6 by 25. Kansas State: 6 by 25. Kansas: 7 by 29.2. Cincinnati: 7 by 39.2. West Virginia: 3 by 12.5. Baylor: 6 by 45. Houston: 4 by 46.7. Texas Tech: 4 by 16.7. Oklahoma State: 4 by 16.7. BYU: 4 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.2 · Games = 5 · -0.8 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 7 · +0.8 vs Wins