Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2023-2025Oregon
Matayo Uiagalelei
LB • 6'5" • 272 lbs • Bellflower, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Matayo Uiagalelei shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.8
Consistency
13.3
Season Value
23.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Oregon
232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oregon
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Matayo Uiagalelei, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Oregon. Matayo Uiagalelei shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Oregon paired 21.5 primary output with 28.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Oregon
Games
15
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
21.8
Usage
8.4
Consistency
13.3
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112131415
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 0. Texas Tech: 2. James Madison: 0. Unknown: 4. Oklahoma State: 0. Northwestern: 3. Oregon State: 0. Penn State: 4. Indiana: 0. Rutgers: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Iowa: 0.5. Minnesota: 2. USC: 3. Washington: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 2 by 8.3. Texas Tech: 2 by 28.3. James Madison: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 2 by 48.3. Oklahoma State: 1 by 4.2. Northwestern: 3 by 42.5. Oregon State: 1 by 4.2. Penn State: 4 by 56.7. Indiana: 1 by 4.2. Rutgers: 1 by 4.2. Wisconsin: 1 by 4.2. Iowa: 2 by 13.3. Minnesota: 2 by 28.3. USC: 7 by 59.2. Washington: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Wins1.2 · n=12 · +1.2 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=2 · -1.2 vs Wins
First Half1.6 · n=8 · +0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · n=7 · -0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
59.2 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/10 | @ Indiana | L 22-56 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 1/1 | @ Texas Tech | W 23-0 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/21 | vs James Madison | W 51-34 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Washington | W 26-14 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs USCSplash game | W 42-27 | 7 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Minnesota | W 42-13 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Iowa | W 18-16 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Wisconsin | W 21-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Rutgers | W 56-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Indiana | L 20-30 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Penn StateSplash game | W 30-24 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Oregon State | W 41-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Northwestern | W 34-14 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Oklahoma State | W 69-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown2+ sacks · Splash game | — | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Oregon | 7 | 16.1 | 6.6 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oregon | 7 | 16.1 | 6.6 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Oregon | 21.5 | 28.4 | 10.9 | 14.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oregon | 21.5 | 28.4 | 10.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Oregon | 18.5 | 21.8 | 8.4 | -3 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oregon | 18.5 | 21.8 | 8.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.5 takeover score.
#2
Washington
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.9 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
4
Primary metric
Game with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.1 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
4
Primary metric
Game with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.6 takeover score.
#5
Ohio State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Oregon
21.5 primary output · 28.4 efficiency · 10.9 usage
34
#2
2024 Regular Season · Oregon
34
21.5 primary · 28.4 efficiency · 10.9 usage
#3
2025 Postseason · Oregon
23.4
18.5 primary · 21.8 efficiency · 8.4 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
9
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.977
St. John Bosco · Bellflower, CA
- Committed To
- Oregon
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
89
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.