Usage Score
14
Player Dossier
2023-2025Oregon
LB • 6'3" • 263 lbs • Laie, HI, USA
Teitum Tuioti shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
14
Efficiency
42.2
Consistency
64.9
Season Value
55.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Oregon
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Teitum Tuioti, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Oregon. Teitum Tuioti shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.2 disruption score.
Teitum Tuioti played LB for Oregon. Across 3 tracked seasons, Teitum Tuioti recorded 11 receiving yards and 150 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Oregon.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Oregon paired 37.5 primary output with 42.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 42.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Win with 6.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
15
Havoc Plays / G
2.5
Efficiency
42.2
Usage
14
Consistency
64.9
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 0. Texas Tech: 4. James Madison: 6. Montana State: 1. Oklahoma State: 2.5. Northwestern: 1. Oregon State: 2.5. Penn State: 2. Indiana: 2. Rutgers: 2.5. Wisconsin: 0.5. Iowa: 3. Minnesota: 3. USC: 1. Washington: 6.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 2 by 8.3. Texas Tech: 6 by 65. James Madison: 3 by 62.5. Montana State: 5 by 30.8. Oklahoma State: 4 by 41.7. Northwestern: 6 by 35. Oregon State: 3 by 37.5. Penn State: 5 by 40.8. Indiana: 4 by 36.7. Rutgers: 3 by 37.5. Wisconsin: 5 by 25.8. Iowa: 9 by 67.5. Minnesota: 3 by 42.5. USC: 5 by 30.8. Washington: 5 by 70.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Washington
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs Washington
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/10 | @ Indiana | L 22-56 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 1/1 | @ Texas Tech2+ sacks · Splash game | W 23-0 | 6 | 6 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/21 | vs James MadisonSplash game | W 51-34 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ WashingtonSplash game | W 26-14 | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs USC | W 42-27 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs MinnesotaSplash game | W 42-13 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ IowaSplash game | W 18-16 | 9 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Wisconsin | W 21-7 | 5 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ RutgersSplash game | W 56-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs IndianaSplash game | L 20-30 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Penn StateSplash game | W 30-24 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Oregon StateSplash game | W 41-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Northwestern | W 34-14 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Oklahoma StateSplash game | W 69-3 | 4 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Montana State | W 59-13 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oregon
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Oregon | 8 | 16.8 | 4.2 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oregon | 8 | 16.8 | 4.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Oregon | 17 | 30.1 | 9.4 | 9 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oregon | 17 | 30.1 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Oregon | 37.5 | 42.2 | 14 | 20.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oregon | 37.5 | 42.2 | 14 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Washington
Win with 6.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
6.5
Primary metric
6.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.9 takeover score.
#2
Oregon State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 64.7 takeover score.
#3
James Madison
6
Primary metric
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 55.8 takeover score.
#4
Texas Tech
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 49.4 takeover score.
#5
Colorado
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Oregon
37.5 primary output · 42.2 efficiency · 14 usage
55.3
#2
2025 Regular Season · Oregon
55.3
37.5 primary · 42.2 efficiency · 14 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Oregon
30.8
17 primary · 30.1 efficiency · 9.4 usage
2
Impact games
17
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8864
Sheldon · Eugene, OR
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
150
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.