Usage Score
4.7
Player Dossier
2023-2025Texas A&M
T.J. Searcy
DE • 6'5" • 255 lbs • Thomaston, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
T.J. Searcy shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
19.1
Consistency
23.9
Season Value
19.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
23242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Florida • Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
T.J. Searcy, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M. T.J. Searcy shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 10 primary output with 19.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 19.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Florida, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
19.1
Usage
4.7
Consistency
23.9
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 1. UTSA: 0. Utah State: 1. Notre Dame: 0. Auburn: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Florida: 0. Arkansas: 0. LSU: 3.5. Missouri: 0.5. South Carolina: 2. Texas: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 3 by 22.5. UTSA: 0 by 0. Utah State: 1 by 14.2. Notre Dame: 3 by 12.5. Auburn: 1 by 4.2. Mississippi State: 2 by 8.3. Florida: 3 by 12.5. Arkansas: 2 by 8.3. LSU: 3 by 47.5. Missouri: 3 by 17.5. South Carolina: 4 by 36.7. Texas: 6 by 45
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.7 · Games = 10 · -0.8 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 2 · +0.8 vs Wins
First Half0.3 · Games = 6 · -1 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · Games = 6 · +1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
47.5 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South CarolinaSplash game | W 31-30 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Missouri | W 38-17 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSUSplash game | W 49-25 | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State | W 31-9 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn | W 16-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | W 41-40 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State | W 44-22 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida
2023-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Texas A&M
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Florida | 4 | 12.4 | 4.1 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Florida | 7 | 17.6 | 6.6 | 3 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 10 | 19.1 | 4.7 | 3 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 10 | 19.1 | 4.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.3 takeover score.
#2
LSU
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.2 takeover score.
#3
Kentucky
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50 takeover score.
#4
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
#5
LSU
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
10 primary output · 19.1 efficiency · 4.7 usage
19.1
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
19.1
10 primary · 19.1 efficiency · 4.7 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Florida
13.8
7 primary · 17.6 efficiency · 6.6 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9138
Upson-Lee · Thomaston, GA
- Committed To
- Florida
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
91
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 36 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.