Usage Score
10.1
Player Dossier
2022-2025Texas A&M
LT Overton
DL • 6'5" • 278 lbs • Milton, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
LT Overton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.3
Consistency
35.1
Season Value
24.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Texas A&M
222324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas A&M • Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
LT Overton, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Texas A&M. LT Overton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 0 primary output with 8.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, Alabama.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Alabama
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
21.3
Usage
10.1
Consistency
35.1
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 0. Florida State: 1. UL Monroe: 0.5. Wisconsin: 2. Georgia: 1.5. Vanderbilt: 0. Missouri: 3. Tennessee: 0. South Carolina: 0. LSU: 2. Oklahoma: 0. Unknown: 1. Auburn: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 7 by 29.2. Florida State: 3 by 22.5. UL Monroe: 2 by 13.3. Wisconsin: 1 by 24.2. Georgia: 6 by 40. Vanderbilt: 2 by 8.3. Missouri: 6 by 55. Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. South Carolina: 3 by 12.5. LSU: 2 by 28.3. Oklahoma: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 1 by 14.2. Auburn: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins1 · n=9 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · n=3 · -0.7 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · n=7 · +0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half0.5 · n=6 · -0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Missouri
Best efficiency game
55 vs Missouri
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | @ Indiana | L 3-38 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/30 | @ Auburn | W 27-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Oklahoma | L 21-23 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | vs LSU | W 20-9 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ South Carolina | W 29-22 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Tennessee | W 37-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Missouri | W 27-24 | 6 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Vanderbilt | W 30-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Georgia | W 24-21 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Wisconsin | W 38-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs UL Monroe | W 73-0 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Florida State | L 17-31 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Alabama
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 4 | 16.9 | 5 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | 8.9 | 1.7 | -4 |
| 2024 Postseason | Alabama | 6 | 19.6 | 5.8 | 6 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Alabama | 6 | 19.6 | 5.8 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Alabama | 11 | 21.3 | 10.1 | 5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Alabama | 11 | 21.3 | 10.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Missouri
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 66.1 takeover score.
#2
Wisconsin
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.6 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.1 takeover score.
#4
Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 41.8 takeover score.
#5
Wisconsin
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Texas A&M
0 primary output · 8.9 efficiency · 1.7 usage
36.8
#2
2025 Postseason · Alabama
24.3
11 primary · 21.3 efficiency · 10.1 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Alabama
24.3
11 primary · 21.3 efficiency · 10.1 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9932
Milton · Alpharetta, GA
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
130
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 43 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.