Player Stats

Tyler Jefferson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
520
Passing yards
286
Rushing yards
234
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2023 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan1101028.6
2024 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan7519286233168
2025 Regular SeasonFlorida A&M000000.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Central Michigan paired 519 primary output with 60.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 60.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Central Michigan, Florida A&M.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ohio

Loss with 123 yards of offense and 62.6 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Central Michigan

Games

7

Primary Metric / G

74.1

Efficiency

60.1

Usage

16

Consistency

76.3

Best Game by takeover score

Ohio

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Central Connecticut: 38. Florida International: 62. Illinois: 41. Ohio: 123. Eastern Michigan: 85. Miami (OH): 99. Bowling Green: 71

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Connecticut: 6 by 65. Florida International: 8 by 75.4. Illinois: 6 by 65.6. Ohio: 23 by 62.6. Eastern Michigan: 21 by 48. Miami (OH): 25 by 48.6. Bowling Green: 12 by 55.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins38 · Games = 1 · -42.2 vs Losses
Losses80.2 · Games = 6 · +42.2 vs Wins