Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
USC paired 745 primary output with 81 efficiency.
Player Stats
Ja'Kobi Lane College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 1,363
- Receptions
- 99
- Touchdowns
- 18
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | USC | 5 | 3 | 60 | 2 | 30.3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | USC | 5 | 4 | 33 | 0 | 30.3 |
| 2024 Postseason | USC | 12 | 7 | 127 | 3 | 59.1 |
| 2024 Regular Season | USC | 12 | 36 | 398 | 9 | 59.1 |
| 2025 Regular Season | USC | 11 | 49 | 745 | 4 | 79 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 81 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · USC
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
67.7
Efficiency
81
Usage
20.3
Consistency
67.4
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri State: 33. Georgia Southern: 91. Purdue: 115. Illinois: 39. Michigan: 35. Notre Dame: 111. Nebraska: 22. Northwestern: 74. Iowa: 65. Oregon: 108. UCLA: 52
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri State: 3 by 73.3. Georgia Southern: 3 by 100. Purdue: 3 by 100. Illinois: 4 by 65. Michigan: 5 by 46.7. Notre Dame: 6 by 100. Nebraska: 2 by 73.3. Northwestern: 7 by 70.5. Iowa: 7 by 61.9. Oregon: 6 by 100. UCLA: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins60.9 · Games = 8 · -25.1 vs Losses
Losses86 · Games = 3 · +25.1 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Ja'Kobi Lane
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.