Usage Score
11.4
Player Dossier
2022-2025Texas A&M
TE • 6'6" • 257 lbs • Stockholm, Sweden
Theo Melin Ohrstrom reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11.4
Efficiency
51.1
Consistency
65.5
Season Value
54.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Theo Melin Ohrstrom, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M. Theo Melin Ohrstrom reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Theo Melin Ohrstrom played TE for Texas A&M. Across 4 tracked seasons, Theo Melin Ohrstrom recorded 352 receiving yards, 3 tackles, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 168 primary output with 51.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 51.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
18.7
Efficiency
51.1
Usage
11.4
Consistency
65.5
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 1. UTSA: 23. Utah State: 16. Notre Dame: 9. Florida: 24. Arkansas: 1. LSU: 32. Missouri: 19. Texas: 43
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 1 by 6.7. UTSA: 3 by 51.1. Utah State: 2 by 53.3. Notre Dame: 2 by 30. Florida: 3 by 53.3. Arkansas: 1 by 6.7. LSU: 2 by 100. Missouri: 2 by 63.3. Texas: 3 by 95.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Missouri | W 38-17 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | W 41-40 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State | W 44-22 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 1 | 15 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 184 | 68.9 | 8.7 | 184 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 168 | 51.1 | 11.4 | -16 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 168 | 51.1 | 11.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
New Mexico State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
111
Primary metric
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#3
LSU
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Florida
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Bowling Green
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
168 primary output · 51.1 efficiency · 11.4 usage
54.3
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
54.3
168 primary · 51.1 efficiency · 11.4 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Texas A&M
50.3
184 primary · 68.9 efficiency · 8.7 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9162
RIG Academy · Sweden, SWED
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
352
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 16 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.