Usage Score
27.4
Player Dossier
2023-2025Pittsburgh
QB • 6'4" • 225 lbs • Zachary, LA, USA
Eli Holstein is a balanced quarterback profile with 18 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
27.4
Efficiency
62.2
Consistency
70.4
Season Value
65
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2024 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eli Holstein, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2024 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. Eli Holstein is a balanced quarterback profile with 18 usage in the latest tracked season.
Eli Holstein played QB for Alabama and Pittsburgh. Across 3 tracked seasons, Eli Holstein recorded 3,306 passing yards, 416 rushing yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Pittsburgh paired 2,553 primary output with 62.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 62.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, Pittsburgh.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
255.3
Efficiency
62.2
Usage
27.4
Consistency
70.4
Best Game by takeover score
North Carolina
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 334. Cincinnati: 338. West Virginia: 360. Youngstown State: 340. North Carolina: 457. California: 134. Syracuse: 128. SMU: 267. Virginia: 139. Louisville: 56
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 45 by 59.1. Cincinnati: 45 by 63.4. West Virginia: 44 by 73.9. Youngstown State: 33 by 88.1. North Carolina: 52 by 75.4. California: 36 by 40.6. Syracuse: 21 by 66.7. SMU: 58 by 53.5. Virginia: 30 by 53.3. Louisville: 7 by 47.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
North Carolina
Best efficiency game
88.1 vs Youngstown State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/23 | @ Louisville | L 9-37 | 3 | 5 | 51 | 60.0 | 0 | 1 | 47.5 | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs Virginia | L 19-24 | 10 | 23 | 121 | 43.5 | 0 | 0 | 53.3 | 7 | 18 | 2.60 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/3 | @ SMU | L 25-48 | 29 | 48 | 248 | 60.4 | 0 | 1 | 53.5 | 10 | 19 | 1.90 | 0 | 24 |
| Thu 10/24 | vs Syracuse | W 41-13 | 11 | 15 | 108 | 73.3 | 2 | 0 | 66.7 | 6 | 20 | 3.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs California | W 17-15 | 14 | 28 | 133 | 50.0 | 0 | 2 | 40.6 | 8 | 1 | 0.10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ North Carolina300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 34-24 | 25 | 42 | 381 | 59.5 | 3 | 1 | 75.4 | 10 | 76 | 7.60 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Youngstown State3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 73-17 | 16 | 24 | 247 | 66.7 | 3 | 0 | 88.1 | 9 | 93 | 10.30 | 2 | 49 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs West Virginia300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 38-34 | 21 | 30 | 301 | 70.0 | 3 | 0 | 73.9 | 14 | 59 | 4.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Cincinnati300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 28-27 | 20 | 35 | 302 | 57.1 | 3 | 1 | 63.4 | 10 | 36 | 3.60 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Kent State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 55-24 | 30 | 40 | 333 | 75.0 | 3 | 1 | 59.1 | 5 | 1 | 0.20 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Alabama
2023
Opening stop
Pittsburgh
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 2,553 | 62.2 | 27.4 | 2,553 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1,169 | 54.8 | 18 | -1,384 |
#1 Featured game
North Carolina
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
457
Primary metric
457 total offense with 75.4 efficiency.
#2
West Virginia
360
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
360 total offense with 73.9 efficiency.
#3
Central Michigan
340
Primary metric
Win with 340 yards of offense and 85.3 efficiency.
340 total offense with 85.3 efficiency.
#4
Youngstown State
340
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
340 total offense with 88.1 efficiency.
#5
West Virginia
276
Primary metric
Loss with 276 yards of offense and 54.2 efficiency.
276 total offense with 54.2 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2024 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
2,553 primary output · 62.2 efficiency · 27.4 usage
65
#2
2025 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
44.4
1,169 primary · 54.8 efficiency · 18 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Alabama
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
6
250+ passing yards
6
300+ total offense
7
3+ TD games
7
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.958
Zachary · Zachary, LA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
3,722
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 17 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.