Usage Score
15.7
Player Profile
Anthony Brown-Stephens
WR • 5'10" • 170 lbs • Springfield, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Anthony Brown-Stephens reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.3
Consistency
59.5
Season Value
62.6
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tulane
23242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Primary stop by seasons
- Kentucky
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tulane
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Anthony Brown-Stephens, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tulane. Anthony Brown-Stephens reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Tulane paired 523 primary output with 75.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kentucky, Tulane.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Tulane
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
40.2
Efficiency
75.3
Usage
15.7
Consistency
59.5
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 57. South Alabama: 19. Duke: 17. Ole Miss: 6. Tulsa: 32. East Carolina: 36. Army: 52. UTSA: 58. Memphis: 69. Florida Atlantic: 52. Temple: 5. Charlotte: 98. North Texas: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 6 by 63.3. South Alabama: 2 by 63.3. Duke: 2 by 56.7. Ole Miss: 1 by 40. Tulsa: 2 by 100. East Carolina: 3 by 80. Army: 5 by 69.3. UTSA: 3 by 100. Memphis: 3 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 100. Temple: 1 by 33.3. Charlotte: 9 by 72.6. North Texas: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins40.2 · n=10 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses40.3 · n=3 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half31.3 · n=7 · -19.4 vs Second Half
Second Half50.7 · n=6 · +19.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | @ Ole Miss | L 10-41 | — | 6 | 57 | 7.6 | 9.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 12/6 | vs North Texas | W 34-21 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 11/30 | vs CharlotteHigh volume | W 27-0 | — | 9 | 98 | 10.4 | 10.90 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Temple | W 37-13 | — | 1 | 5 | 6.5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 35-24 | — | 3 | 52 | 16.8 | 17.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Memphis | W 38-32 | — | 3 | 69 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 54 |
| Thu 10/30 | @ UTSA | L 26-48 | — | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Army | W 24-17 | — | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 18 |
| Thu 10/9 | vs East Carolina | W 26-19 | — | 3 | 36 | 9 | 12 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Tulsa | W 31-14 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Ole Miss | L 10-45 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Duke | W 34-27 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ South Alabama | W 33-31 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kentucky
2023-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Tulane
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Kentucky | 44 | 52 | 5.5 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Kentucky | 77 | 68.9 | 9.1 | 33 |
| 2025 Postseason | Tulane | 523 | 75.3 | 15.7 | 446 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Tulane | 523 | 75.3 | 15.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
51
Primary metric
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tennessee
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Charlotte
98
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 72.6 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UTSA
58
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Tulane
523 primary output · 75.3 efficiency · 15.7 usage
62.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · Tulane
62.6
523 primary · 75.3 efficiency · 15.7 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Kentucky
30.3
44 primary · 52 efficiency · 5.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.89
Springfield · Springfield, OH
- Committed To
- Kentucky
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
644
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.