Usage Score
0.6
Player Dossier
2023-2025Oklahoma State
LB • 6'4" • 235 lbs • Kansas City, MO, USA
Chandavian Bradley shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
0.6
Efficiency
4.2
Consistency
100
Season Value
34.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chandavian Bradley, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma State. Chandavian Bradley shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Oklahoma State paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tennessee, Oklahoma State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
4.2
Usage
0.6
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 0. Baylor: 0. Texas Tech: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 1 by 4.2. Baylor: 1 by 4.2. Texas Tech: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Best efficiency game
4.2 vs Texas Tech
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2023
Opening stop
Oklahoma State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas Tech
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Primary metric
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.6 takeover score.
#2
Baylor
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.6 takeover score.
#3
Tulsa
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.6 usage
34.9
#2
2023 Regular Season · Tennessee
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9436
Platte County · Platte City, MO
Career Facts
2
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
3
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 3 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Chandavian Bradley quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit