Player Stats

Vinny Anthony College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,162
Receptions
80
Touchdowns
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2022 PostseasonWisconsin3-0050.1
2022 Regular SeasonWisconsin3-0050.1
2023 PostseasonWisconsin6315040.4
2023 Regular SeasonWisconsin6784040.4
2024 Regular SeasonWisconsin1139672483.5
2025 Regular SeasonWisconsin1231391557

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Wisconsin paired 672 primary output with 91.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 70.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Wisconsin

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

32.6

Efficiency

70.6

Usage

21.3

Consistency

28.2

Best Game by takeover score

Minnesota

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 57. Middle Tennessee: 50. Alabama: 8. Maryland: 46. Michigan: 97. Iowa: 16. Ohio State: 5. Oregon: 12. Washington: 0. Indiana: 8. Illinois: 0. Minnesota: 92

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 4 by 95. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 83.3. Alabama: 1 by 53.3. Maryland: 3 by 100. Michigan: 9 by 71.9. Iowa: 3 by 35.6. Ohio State: 1 by 33.3. Oregon: 1 by 80. Indiana: 1 by 53.3. Minnesota: 4 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins26.8 · Games = 4 · -8.8 vs Losses
Losses35.5 · Games = 8 · +8.8 vs Wins