Usage Score
24.2
Player Dossier
2022-2025Central Michigan
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Savannah, GA, USA
Langston Lewis reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
24.2
Efficiency
75
Consistency
51.7
Season Value
62.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Langston Lewis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Central Michigan. Langston Lewis reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Langston Lewis played WR for Central Michigan. Across 4 tracked seasons, Langston Lewis recorded 31 rushing yards, 675 receiving yards, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Central Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 596 primary output with 75 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
45.8
Efficiency
75
Usage
24.2
Consistency
51.7
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 83. San José State: 14. Pittsburgh: 21. Michigan: 4. Unknown: 39. Eastern Michigan: 45. Akron: 4. Bowling Green: 0. Massachusetts: 57. Western Michigan: 111. Buffalo: 118. Kent State: 29. Toledo: 71
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 8 by 69.2. San José State: 1 by 93.3. Pittsburgh: 1 by 100. Michigan: 1 by 26.7. Unknown: 4 by 65. Eastern Michigan: 7 by 42.9. Akron: 1 by 26.7. Massachusetts: 2 by 100. Western Michigan: 4 by 100. Buffalo: 6 by 100. Kent State: 2 by 96.7. Toledo: 6 by 78.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/26 | @ NorthwesternHigh volume | L 7-34 | — | 8 | 83 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Toledo | L 3-21 | — | 6 | 71 | 8.1 | 11.80 | 0 | 37 |
| Thu 11/20 | @ Kent State | W 28-16 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Thu 11/13 | vs Buffalo100 receiving yards | W 38-19 | — | 6 | 118 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Western Michigan100 receiving yards | L 21-24 | — | 4 | 111 | 27.8 | 27.80 | 1 | 77 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Massachusetts | W 38-13 | — | 2 | 57 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Bowling Green | W 27-6 | — | — | — | -3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Akron | L 22-28 | — | 1 | 4 | 2.3 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 24-13 | — | 7 | 45 | 6.4 | 6.40 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 39 | 12.3 | 9.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Michigan | L 3-63 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Pittsburgh | L 17-45 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ San José State | W 16-14 | — | 1 | 14 | 8 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 52 | 73.4 | 5.6 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 27 | 90 | 14.3 | -25 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | -27 |
| 2025 Postseason | Central Michigan | 596 | 75 | 24.2 | 596 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 596 | 75 | 24.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111
Primary metric
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Buffalo
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
45
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Michigan
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#5
Northwestern
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 69.2 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Central Michigan
596 primary output · 75 efficiency · 24.2 usage
62.7
#2
2025 Regular Season · Central Michigan
62.7
596 primary · 75 efficiency · 24.2 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Central Michigan
52.3
27 primary · 90 efficiency · 14.3 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.7883
Islands · Savannah, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
675
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 16 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.